<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pviot Reports on Aggregated Data- Proc report, proc means or proc summary ? in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Pviot-Reports-on-Aggregated-Data-Proc-report-proc-means-or-proc/m-p/574698#M75406</link>
    <description>Without a better understanding of how you plan to calculate the "cum percentage", this is a nearly impossible task.&lt;BR /&gt;For example, your name1 has a 2 rows with total amount of 300. So I assume that your column 2 value would be 300 and your column 4 value would be 2. But, how to calculate the cum percentage based on 300 -- what is the denominator to calculate the percentage? The total of all the amount values?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't understand what you mean by number of missing? Number of rows with missing names, with missing amounts? Why/how would you have a name without an amount or an amount without a name? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you post some data, just a small sample and then show, EXACTLY, what results you expect given your data. Because without any information on how to base "cum percentage", it is impossible to make a constructive suggestion -- there's not enough information.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cynthia</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Cynthia_sas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-18T17:56:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pviot Reports on Aggregated Data- Proc report, proc means or proc summary ?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Pviot-Reports-on-Aggregated-Data-Proc-report-proc-means-or-proc/m-p/574571#M75402</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I got following data:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Name Amount&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 100&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;200&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 300&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What procedure is best to use to create following report/output:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1st Col&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2ndCol&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3rd&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4th&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Name1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Aggregated Sum of Amount of Name1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Cum. Percentage of Agg.Sum Name1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Counts of Name1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Name2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Aggregated Sum of Amount&amp;nbsp;of Name2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Cum. Percentage of Agg.Sum Name1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Counts of Name1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Name3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Aggregated Sum of Amount of Name3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Cum. Percentage of Agg.Sum Name1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Counts of Name1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total....&amp;nbsp; Total of Aggregated Sum&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 100%&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Total Counts&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Number of Missing:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried it with proc report so far, but I did not get the desired results´. I'm using SAS Enterprise Guide, so I'm also open to drag &amp;amp; drop solutions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;fuhgid&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 13:54:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Pviot-Reports-on-Aggregated-Data-Proc-report-proc-means-or-proc/m-p/574571#M75402</guid>
      <dc:creator>fuhgidabowit</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-18T13:54:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pviot Reports on Aggregated Data- Proc report, proc means or proc summary ?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Pviot-Reports-on-Aggregated-Data-Proc-report-proc-means-or-proc/m-p/574698#M75406</link>
      <description>Without a better understanding of how you plan to calculate the "cum percentage", this is a nearly impossible task.&lt;BR /&gt;For example, your name1 has a 2 rows with total amount of 300. So I assume that your column 2 value would be 300 and your column 4 value would be 2. But, how to calculate the cum percentage based on 300 -- what is the denominator to calculate the percentage? The total of all the amount values?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I don't understand what you mean by number of missing? Number of rows with missing names, with missing amounts? Why/how would you have a name without an amount or an amount without a name? &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Can you post some data, just a small sample and then show, EXACTLY, what results you expect given your data. Because without any information on how to base "cum percentage", it is impossible to make a constructive suggestion -- there's not enough information.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cynthia</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 17:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Pviot-Reports-on-Aggregated-Data-Proc-report-proc-means-or-proc/m-p/574698#M75406</guid>
      <dc:creator>Cynthia_sas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-18T17:56:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pviot Reports on Aggregated Data- Proc report, proc means or proc summary ?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Pviot-Reports-on-Aggregated-Data-Proc-report-proc-means-or-proc/m-p/574753#M75411</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pviot Reports on Aggregated Data- Proc report, proc means or proc summary ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why does it have to be one of these three? Why not one of the above (specifically PROC MEANS or PROC SUMMARY), followed by a DATA step?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Jul 2019 19:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Pviot-Reports-on-Aggregated-Data-Proc-report-proc-means-or-proc/m-p/574753#M75411</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-18T19:41:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

