<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Assumption of normality i GLM in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Assumption-of-normality-i-GLM/m-p/567258#M75121</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not only that, but the standard deviation of the residuals is getting smaller, too.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you fit more variables, you are explaining more of the data. The model fits the data better, which means that the residuals are getting closer to the regression surface.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have one regressor, there might be observations that are far from the model. These "outliers" show up in the residual histogram as being far from the zero. Thus the histogram does not look bell-shaped. As you add more regressors, there are fewer outliers and the surface passes close to all the points. The histogram of residuals will be very bell-shaped and narrow (small standard deviation).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-19T13:24:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Assumption of normality i GLM</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Assumption-of-normality-i-GLM/m-p/567178#M75115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's more a stat problem, than an actual SAS-problem...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've made a regression analysis using general linear model in SAS. I have made four models for the same association I want to explore, but with different number of covariates (confounders). When I check the model assumption for normality, I noticed that the distribution of the models residuals gets more and more normal distributed with rising number of covariates in the model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could anyone explain me why this happens? Preferably in a "not so mathematical way"? &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 09:07:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Assumption-of-normality-i-GLM/m-p/567178#M75115</guid>
      <dc:creator>Biniie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T09:07:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Assumption of normality i GLM</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Assumption-of-normality-i-GLM/m-p/567258#M75121</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not only that, but the standard deviation of the residuals is getting smaller, too.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As you fit more variables, you are explaining more of the data. The model fits the data better, which means that the residuals are getting closer to the regression surface.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have one regressor, there might be observations that are far from the model. These "outliers" show up in the residual histogram as being far from the zero. Thus the histogram does not look bell-shaped. As you add more regressors, there are fewer outliers and the surface passes close to all the points. The histogram of residuals will be very bell-shaped and narrow (small standard deviation).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 13:24:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Assumption-of-normality-i-GLM/m-p/567258#M75121</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-19T13:24:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

