<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative? in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554343#M74666</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This was not obvious when you originally stated your problem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, if you have PROC MI, you should have PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC, they are both part of SAS/STAT.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What happens when you try to use PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:59:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-26T16:59:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554323#M74658</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I am doing some multiple imputation. As some of you know, there are three steps to this. The second step requires use of&amp;nbsp;PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC. I think it's main role is to save the parameter estimates for the final step. Is there an alternative to using it so i can accomplish all three steps?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:27:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554323#M74658</guid>
      <dc:creator>edasdfasdfasdfa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T15:27:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554324#M74659</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think that's the only thing that SURVEYLOGISTIC does, but I think it unlikely that some other combination of data step and PROCs will get the same results — unless you are willing to do a large amount of programming.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:30:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554324#M74659</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T15:30:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554328#M74660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I did just the first step of the three step imputation process (which did fill in the values)..and did perfectly well when I fit the train data to the validation. (a bit over 80% accuracy)...so not sure..are the three steps always necessary?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:43:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554328#M74660</guid>
      <dc:creator>edasdfasdfasdfa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T15:43:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554329#M74661</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are talking about using Proc MI or some other process?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:46:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554329#M74661</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T15:46:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554331#M74662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, I used proc mi to impute based on all the guidelines. But then couldn't do the second step.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:57:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554331#M74662</guid>
      <dc:creator>edasdfasdfasdfa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T15:57:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554340#M74663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have left out some important details.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;But then couldn't do the second step.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Why not? What did you try to do? What stopped you? What happened?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;And also: what exactly is the second step, anyway? Give us the details.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554340#M74663</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T16:43:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554341#M74664</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Paige,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am following the procedures in a book called 'Multiple Imputation of missing data using SAS'. The first requires use of proc mi (which I have access to). Here is an example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;proc mi nimpute=3 data=c7_ex1 seed=55 out=c7_ex1_imp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;class racecat gender edcat selfrhealth diabetes arthritis stratum_secu;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;fcs plots=trace(mean(bodywgt)) nbiter=20 logistic (edcat diabetes arthritis)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;discrim(racecat=gender edcat selfrhealth diabetes arthritis&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;/classeffect=include) regression (bodywgt);&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;var stratum_secu kwgtr kage gender racecat edcat diabetes arthritis bodywgt&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;selfrhealth;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;run;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The second step&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt; however requires use of proc surveylogistic which I don't have access to&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. To do this aspect:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="ACode0"&gt;proc surveylogistic data=c7_ex1_imp;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;weight kwgtr; strata stratum; cluster secu;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;by _imputation_;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;class racecat gender edcat selfrhealth / param=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;model diabetes (event='1')=gender racecat selfrhealth bodywgt;&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;ods output parameterestimates=c7_ex1_est;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="ACode0"&gt;proc print data=c7_ex1_est;&lt;BR /&gt;run ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="ACode0"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="ACode0"&gt;The final step requires proc mianalyze which I have:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="ACode0"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="ACode0"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;proc mianalyze parms(classvar=classval)=c7_ex1_est edf=56;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;class racecat gender selfrhealth;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;modeleffects intercept gender racecat selfrhealth bodywgt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;run;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:50:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554341#M74664</guid>
      <dc:creator>edasdfasdfasdfa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T16:50:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554343#M74666</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This was not obvious when you originally stated your problem.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, if you have PROC MI, you should have PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC, they are both part of SAS/STAT.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What happens when you try to use PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:59:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554343#M74666</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T16:59:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554345#M74667</link>
      <description>I'm using a software called WPS that does not have access to this..at least not yet.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:02:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554345#M74667</guid>
      <dc:creator>edasdfasdfasdfa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T17:02:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554348#M74669</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Well, there really is no replacement for PROC SURVEYLOGISITIC, unless you want to do a large amount of programming.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554348#M74669</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T17:05:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554355#M74672</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can't I just use this solution?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2017/01/09/ods-output-any-statistic.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2017/01/09/ods-output-any-statistic.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use ODS TRACE ON (or the SAS documentation) to&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2015/09/08/ods-table-names.html" target="_blank"&gt;find the name of the ODS table that contains the statistic&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;that you want.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Use the ODS OUTPUT statement to specify the table name and a data set name. The syntax is ODS OUTPUT&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;TableName&lt;/EM&gt;=&lt;EM&gt;DataSetName&lt;/EM&gt;. Then run the procedure to generate the table.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Read the data set to obtain the value of the statistic.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know that proc surveylogistic does many things but I think in my context, all I need really is to have some way to store the parameter estimates so that they can be read in the final step of multiple imputation (by proc mianalyze, which I have)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:48:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554355#M74672</guid>
      <dc:creator>edasdfasdfasdfa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T17:48:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554356#M74673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;ODS OUTPUT can collect the results from PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC, which means you have to run PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC, but you have told me you can't.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554356#M74673</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T17:51:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554364#M74674</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Would you be able to tell me if it is totally unnecessary to use proc surveylogistic (for missing values) unless you are using survey data?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:07:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554364#M74674</guid>
      <dc:creator>edasdfasdfasdfa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T18:07:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554366#M74675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;At this point, I would like you to describe the problem and the analysis in detail. I feel I have been guessing at a lot of things.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:19:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554366#M74675</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T18:19:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554374#M74676</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/201537"&gt;@edasdfasdfasdfa&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hi Paige,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am following the procedures in a book called 'Multiple Imputation of missing data using SAS'. The first requires use of proc mi (which I have access to). Here is an example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;proc mi &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;nimpute=3 data=c7_ex1 seed=55 out=c7_ex1_imp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;class racecat gender edcat selfrhealth diabetes arthritis stratum_secu;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;fcs plots=trace(mean(bodywgt)) nbiter=20 logistic (edcat diabetes arthritis)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;discrim(racecat=gender edcat selfrhealth diabetes arthritis&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;/classeffect=include) regression (bodywgt);&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;var stratum_secu kwgtr kage gender racecat edcat diabetes arthritis bodywgt&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;selfrhealth;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;run;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The second step&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;EM&gt; however requires use of proc surveylogistic which I don't have access to&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;. To do this aspect:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Procs MI and Surveylogistic are both part of SAS/STAT. If one is installed the other should be as well. Why do you not have access to Surveylogistic?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 19:22:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554374#M74676</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T19:22:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVERYLOGISTIC Alternative?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554414#M74677</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The only survey proc listed in the &lt;STRONG&gt;WPS&lt;/STRONG&gt; documentation is SURVEYSELECT.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:08:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-SURVERYLOGISTIC-Alternative/m-p/554414#M74677</guid>
      <dc:creator>SuzanneDorinski</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-26T22:08:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

