<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc PLS - interpretation of results in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-interpretation-of-results/m-p/551673#M74567</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;PLS creates dimensions (sometimes called "factors" or "latent factors") which are used to predict Y. So, dimension 1 (which consists of a weighted combination of both minT and maxT) explains 4.749 percent of the Y variability, and dimension 2 (which consists of a weighted combination of both minT and maxT) explains another 0.0097% of the variability of Y.&amp;nbsp;So I think the answer to your exact question "&lt;SPAN&gt;Please how do I get the percentage of yield explained by a combination of&amp;nbsp; MinT and MaxT" is given by this number, but you have to decide if you want to use one dimension, or two dimensions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can obtain information that a certain percent of the variability of minT is used in dimension 1, and additional percent of variability of minT is used in dimension 2 (same is possible for maxT). You would add the VARSS option to the PROC PLS statement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmmvacdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_pls_syntax01.htm&amp;amp;locale=en"&gt;https://documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmmvacdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_pls_syntax01.htm&amp;amp;locale=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:28:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-17T12:28:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc PLS - interpretation of results</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-interpretation-of-results/m-p/551598#M74566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, I am running a Proc PLS to find the correlation between my dependent and independent variables, e.g Yield vs MinT MaxT. I am confused as to which&amp;nbsp; of the tables tells me the percentage of my variables (min T and Max T combined and separately) that explained yield.&amp;nbsp; My model was fine and below are some of my results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please how do I get the percentage of yield explained by a combination of&amp;nbsp; MinT and MaxT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PLS Procedure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;SC=DRY&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Percent Variation Accounted for by Partial Least Squares Factors&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Number of Extracted Factors&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Model Effects&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Dependent Variables&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Current&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Total&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Current&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Total&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;40.0228&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;40.0228&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;4.749&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;4.749&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;59.9772&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;100&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.0097&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;4.7587&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="proc_title_group"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;SC=DRY&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Model Effect Loadings&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Number of Extracted Factors&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;MinT&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;MaxT&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.583192&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.81234&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.778905&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.627142&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Model Effect Weights&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Number of Extracted Factors&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;MinT&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;MaxT&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Inner Regression Coefficients&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.628099&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;-0.78009&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.243576&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.778905&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.627142&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;0.008972&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Dependent Variable Weights&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Number of Extracted Factors&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;Wheat_Y&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;2&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="proc_title_group"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 05:04:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-interpretation-of-results/m-p/551598#M74566</guid>
      <dc:creator>Olanike</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-17T05:04:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc PLS - interpretation of results</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-interpretation-of-results/m-p/551673#M74567</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PLS creates dimensions (sometimes called "factors" or "latent factors") which are used to predict Y. So, dimension 1 (which consists of a weighted combination of both minT and maxT) explains 4.749 percent of the Y variability, and dimension 2 (which consists of a weighted combination of both minT and maxT) explains another 0.0097% of the variability of Y.&amp;nbsp;So I think the answer to your exact question "&lt;SPAN&gt;Please how do I get the percentage of yield explained by a combination of&amp;nbsp; MinT and MaxT" is given by this number, but you have to decide if you want to use one dimension, or two dimensions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You can obtain information that a certain percent of the variability of minT is used in dimension 1, and additional percent of variability of minT is used in dimension 2 (same is possible for maxT). You would add the VARSS option to the PROC PLS statement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmmvacdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_pls_syntax01.htm&amp;amp;locale=en"&gt;https://documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmmvacdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_pls_syntax01.htm&amp;amp;locale=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 12:28:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-interpretation-of-results/m-p/551673#M74567</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-17T12:28:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc PLS - interpretation of results</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-interpretation-of-results/m-p/552002#M74582</link>
      <description>Thank you for the response.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 05:19:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-interpretation-of-results/m-p/552002#M74582</guid>
      <dc:creator>Olanike</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-18T05:19:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

