<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Test parameters of Wood's model in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Test-parameters-of-Wood-s-model/m-p/412837#M67431</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this model how to test the params of this model if are they significant or not to fit a lactation curve by using Wood's question? and also what is the best method for this model to use?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ibrahim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc nlin data = new   plots = fit;
  parms A = 15 B = 0.19 C = -0.0012 ;
  bounds  A B C &amp;gt; 0; 
    by pr  ;
  model  TEST_DAY_MILK_KG = A * Time **b * exp(-C*Time);
  output out = Fit predicted = Pred ;
 run;
QUIT;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Barkamih</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-13T11:36:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Test parameters of Wood's model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Test-parameters-of-Wood-s-model/m-p/412837#M67431</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi guys&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this model how to test the params of this model if are they significant or not to fit a lactation curve by using Wood's question? and also what is the best method for this model to use?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ibrahim&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc nlin data = new   plots = fit;
  parms A = 15 B = 0.19 C = -0.0012 ;
  bounds  A B C &amp;gt; 0; 
    by pr  ;
  model  TEST_DAY_MILK_KG = A * Time **b * exp(-C*Time);
  output out = Fit predicted = Pred ;
 run;
QUIT;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 11:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Test-parameters-of-Wood-s-model/m-p/412837#M67431</guid>
      <dc:creator>Barkamih</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-13T11:36:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Test parameters of Wood's model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Test-parameters-of-Wood-s-model/m-p/413091#M67441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't know what "Wood's method" is, but the ParameterEstimates&amp;nbsp;table includes 95% confidence intervals. If the CIs include 0, then the parameter estimates are not significantly different from 0.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The "best" method is the one that converges fastest for your data. For this model&amp;nbsp;that has one&amp;nbsp;explanatory variable, I see no reason to favor one method over another. I would use the default unless it doesn't converge.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By the way, your initial guess for C violates the constraint that C &amp;gt; 0.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:45:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Test-parameters-of-Wood-s-model/m-p/413091#M67441</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-13T21:45:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

