<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Proc SQL reading Oracle tables in Version 9.1.3 - not consistent results in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-SQL-reading-Oracle-tables-in-Version-9-1-3-not-consistent/m-p/397576#M66568</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am reading Oracle tables via Proc SQL in SAS version 9.1.3.&amp;nbsp; I have successfully used SAS to read the Oracle tables for over 10 years.&amp;nbsp; The past couple of months I will run the same program, back-to-back, and get a different number of observations as a result.&amp;nbsp; I do not know if this is an Oracle database problem, or if perhaps my SAS version is unreliable or too old?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I sometimes get values for a field that do not exist.&amp;nbsp; For example:&amp;nbsp; values for user_status should be 'Active - Promotion', 'Active - New Hire', and I will get values like 'motionActive - Pro' which is not a valid value for user_status.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone encountered problems such as these?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:11:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LeeDavis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-20T19:11:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc SQL reading Oracle tables in Version 9.1.3 - not consistent results</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-SQL-reading-Oracle-tables-in-Version-9-1-3-not-consistent/m-p/397576#M66568</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am reading Oracle tables via Proc SQL in SAS version 9.1.3.&amp;nbsp; I have successfully used SAS to read the Oracle tables for over 10 years.&amp;nbsp; The past couple of months I will run the same program, back-to-back, and get a different number of observations as a result.&amp;nbsp; I do not know if this is an Oracle database problem, or if perhaps my SAS version is unreliable or too old?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I sometimes get values for a field that do not exist.&amp;nbsp; For example:&amp;nbsp; values for user_status should be 'Active - Promotion', 'Active - New Hire', and I will get values like 'motionActive - Pro' which is not a valid value for user_status.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone encountered problems such as these?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:11:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-SQL-reading-Oracle-tables-in-Version-9-1-3-not-consistent/m-p/397576#M66568</guid>
      <dc:creator>LeeDavis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-20T19:11:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc SQL reading Oracle tables in Version 9.1.3 - not consistent results</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-SQL-reading-Oracle-tables-in-Version-9-1-3-not-consistent/m-p/397580#M66569</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's difficult to make values up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have you confirmed these values do not exist in the Oracle Tables? Has your Oracle DB or the ODBC engine changed?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you using a specific driver or ODBC?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SAS 9.1.3 is ancient...and that is the technical term, so if you have any ability to update I would highly highly recommend it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2013/08/02/how-old-is-your-version-of-sas-release-dates-for-sas-software.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2013/08/02/how-old-is-your-version-of-sas-release-dates-for-sas-software.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:19:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-SQL-reading-Oracle-tables-in-Version-9-1-3-not-consistent/m-p/397580#M66569</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-20T19:19:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc SQL reading Oracle tables in Version 9.1.3 - not consistent results</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-SQL-reading-Oracle-tables-in-Version-9-1-3-not-consistent/m-p/397600#M66570</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I wonder if you are seeing some artifact of timing. Perhaps the documentation says you only have those two values as the permanent stored value but if a new record is being created, or perhaps an existing record is being editted somewhere, perhaps that is a temporary holding value until it is committed to the data base and you are reading it before the committal completes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A pure WAG on my part.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:20:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-SQL-reading-Oracle-tables-in-Version-9-1-3-not-consistent/m-p/397600#M66570</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-20T20:20:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

