<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: A question about the PROC FREQ in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371706#M65147</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes I think &lt;SPAN class="short_text"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;It does not make sense&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>John4</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-29T14:16:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A question about the PROC FREQ</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371676#M65143</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;My data set look like this :&lt;BR /&gt;Birth&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Death&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;InfantDeath&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Country&lt;BR /&gt;24.7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5.7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 30.8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Albania&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I am using this code for analyse my data :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;PROC FREQ DATA = MYDATA;
TABLE BIRTH*COUNTRY / CHISQ;
RUN;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cramér's V is a measure of association between two nominal variables but I dont understnd why SAS compute Cramér's V for continuous variable and categorial variable ? In the output I got 0.2236 as V cramer for these variables : Birth and Country&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:21:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371676#M65143</guid>
      <dc:creator>John4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T13:21:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A question about the PROC FREQ</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371678#M65144</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;PROC FREQ treats all variables as categorical. It doesn't know and doesn't care that you think a variable is continuous.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:26:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371678#M65144</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T13:26:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A question about the PROC FREQ</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371686#M65145</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So we have to interpret the result 0.2236 as usually ? (I mean : "weak effect", "small effect", etc...)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or is there a method to deal with that ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 13:47:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371686#M65145</guid>
      <dc:creator>John4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T13:47:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A question about the PROC FREQ</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371701#M65146</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/134590"&gt;@John4&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So we have to interpret the result 0.2236 as usually ? (I mean : "weak effect", "small effect", etc...)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Or is there a method to deal with that ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I am understanding the question properly (and I may not be), you would not try to interpet a calculations of Cramer's V in this situation as it is meaningless.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:11:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371701#M65146</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T14:11:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: A question about the PROC FREQ</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371706#M65147</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes I think &lt;SPAN class="short_text"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;It does not make sense&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 14:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/A-question-about-the-PROC-FREQ/m-p/371706#M65147</guid>
      <dc:creator>John4</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-29T14:16:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

