<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic How would one evaluate rank-ordered survey data (do pre/post comparisons, w/influential variables)? in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340836#M63265</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a pre- and post-survey data set where 10 items were ranked in order (1-10, from least to greatest) by the surveyed individuals (n=~500 total, having varying&amp;nbsp;catergorical personal attributes such as sex, education level). What would be the&amp;nbsp;most appropriate method to compare pre and post&amp;nbsp;survey results&amp;nbsp;of the ordering,&amp;nbsp;determining which of the particular ranked&amp;nbsp;items had statistically significant changes to their ordering, and&amp;nbsp;determining the significance of influential personal attributes.&amp;nbsp; An example of the data set could be as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000080" face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;data&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt; surv;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;length&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&amp;nbsp;prepost $ 4&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;input&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&amp;nbsp;id $ sex $ educ $ prepost $ apple banana blueberry cherry grape melon &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; orange pineapple rasberry strawberry&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;cards&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1&amp;nbsp;M HS&amp;nbsp;pre&amp;nbsp; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 M HS post 1 3 2 4 5 6 10 8 9 7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&amp;nbsp;F BS pre&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;4 3&amp;nbsp;2 5 6 7 8 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&amp;nbsp;F BS post 1 3 2 4 5 6&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;7 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&amp;nbsp;M BS pre&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;2 1&amp;nbsp;3&amp;nbsp;4 5&amp;nbsp;7&amp;nbsp;6 8 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&amp;nbsp;M BS post 1 3 2 4 5 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10&amp;nbsp;7 9 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4&amp;nbsp;F HS pre&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;1&amp;nbsp;2&amp;nbsp;3 4&amp;nbsp;7&amp;nbsp;6&amp;nbsp; 5 8 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4&amp;nbsp;F HS post 1&amp;nbsp;5 2 3&amp;nbsp;4&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;10&amp;nbsp;7 8 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;updated the last two rows to correct for ID = 4&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SGraham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-15T12:15:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How would one evaluate rank-ordered survey data (do pre/post comparisons, w/influential variables)?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340836#M63265</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a pre- and post-survey data set where 10 items were ranked in order (1-10, from least to greatest) by the surveyed individuals (n=~500 total, having varying&amp;nbsp;catergorical personal attributes such as sex, education level). What would be the&amp;nbsp;most appropriate method to compare pre and post&amp;nbsp;survey results&amp;nbsp;of the ordering,&amp;nbsp;determining which of the particular ranked&amp;nbsp;items had statistically significant changes to their ordering, and&amp;nbsp;determining the significance of influential personal attributes.&amp;nbsp; An example of the data set could be as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000080" face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;data&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt; surv;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;length&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&amp;nbsp;prepost $ 4&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;input&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&amp;nbsp;id $ sex $ educ $ prepost $ apple banana blueberry cherry grape melon &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; orange pineapple rasberry strawberry&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#0000ff" face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;cards&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="Courier New" size="2"&gt;;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1&amp;nbsp;M HS&amp;nbsp;pre&amp;nbsp; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 M HS post 1 3 2 4 5 6 10 8 9 7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&amp;nbsp;F BS pre&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;4 3&amp;nbsp;2 5 6 7 8 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2&amp;nbsp;F BS post 1 3 2 4 5 6&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;7 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&amp;nbsp;M BS pre&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;2 1&amp;nbsp;3&amp;nbsp;4 5&amp;nbsp;7&amp;nbsp;6 8 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3&amp;nbsp;M BS post 1 3 2 4 5 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;10&amp;nbsp;7 9 8&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4&amp;nbsp;F HS pre&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;1&amp;nbsp;2&amp;nbsp;3 4&amp;nbsp;7&amp;nbsp;6&amp;nbsp; 5 8 9 10&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4&amp;nbsp;F HS post 1&amp;nbsp;5 2 3&amp;nbsp;4&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;10&amp;nbsp;7 8 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;updated the last two rows to correct for ID = 4&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2017 12:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340836#M63265</guid>
      <dc:creator>SGraham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-15T12:15:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How would one evaluate rank-ordered survey data (do pre/post comparisons, w/influential variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340935#M63270</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the meaning of ID? It isn't unique to a pair of pre-post observations?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:34:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340935#M63270</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-14T19:34:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How would one evaluate rank-ordered survey data (do pre/post comparisons, w/influential variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340936#M63271</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your response/question. I hope the following clarifies my request.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ID&amp;nbsp;represents&amp;nbsp;a&amp;nbsp;unique study subject.&amp;nbsp;All subjects have pre-&amp;nbsp;and post-&amp;nbsp;data,&amp;nbsp;that is, the survey&amp;nbsp;was administered (pre) to each subject, there was an intervention, the survey was re-administered (post) to each subject.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;basic questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) overall, did the intervention have an impact, were the rankings affected?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) where/what particular items&amp;nbsp;had the&amp;nbsp;greatest/most significant change?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) are there influential personal variables of that affect the ranking (pre, post, and/or the change)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:49:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340936#M63271</guid>
      <dc:creator>SGraham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-14T19:49:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How would one evaluate rank-ordered survey data (do pre/post comparisons, w/influential variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340938#M63272</link>
      <description>oh I see now why you asked that question, I made that data set up as an example, the last two rows should have the ID as 4. apologies</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 19:50:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340938#M63272</guid>
      <dc:creator>SGraham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-14T19:50:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How would one evaluate rank-ordered survey data (do pre/post comparisons, w/influential variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340961#M63274</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Two basic things I would start with.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First a proc freq for each of the variables crossed with the prepost variable and generate chi-square tests. Something like:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;proc freq data=surv;
  tables prepost *(apple banana blueberry cherry grape melon 
       orange pineapple rasberry strawberry) / chisq  ;
run;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That would tell you whether the distributions are the same. Options to consider would be Deviation, showing the difference of actual vs expected frequency for cells, JT, and&amp;nbsp;might look at Plots as well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I might also look at Proc TTest to see if the means move for any of the "fruit" variables but your data will need some resturturing to do a before/after structure. See TTEST documentation for an example.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:08:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/How-would-one-evaluate-rank-ordered-survey-data-do-pre-post/m-p/340961#M63274</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-14T21:08:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

