<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Regression analysis in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116287#M32081</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;P value less than 0.05 is statistical significant if your possibility of committing the first mistake&amp;nbsp; is .05 .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That means your H0 hypothesis (Type of Case and Headache are independent ) is not right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.05 discover there are some correlation between Type of Case and Headache .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend you also use corresponding analysis to check this relation more .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ksharp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-11-05T02:21:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116279#M32073</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have something like shown below,'&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Type of Case&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CaseA&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CaseB&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CaseC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diabetes&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N=&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N=&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N=&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AIDS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Headache&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fever&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; N&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I did a contingency table of :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Diabetes with Cases&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Aids with Cases&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Headache with Cases&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Fever with Cases&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Found that the p-values are significant for a couple of them(less than 0.05)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the meaning of that statistically?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also how to do a regression analysis....How do I proceed from there???&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any help is highly appreciated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 19:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116279#M32073</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T19:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116280#M32074</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whenever a p value is less than 0.05, this indicates that the quantity being tested is statistically significant (at the alpha=0.05 level). In layman's terms, this particular arrangement of data that is tested was unlikely to have happened by random chance, it is probably a "real" effect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You cannot do regression on this data. You need to have continuous X and continuous Y to do a regression.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 19:56:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116280#M32074</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T19:56:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116281#M32075</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you also provide me with the basics for understanding Logistic Regression ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:04:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116281#M32075</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T20:04:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116282#M32076</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Logistic regression is appropriate when you have a continuous X variable, and a categorical Y variable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, if X is temperature, and Y is pass/fail status.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Among other things, logistic regression will compute the probability that you get a pass (or a fail) at a given temperature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116282#M32076</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T20:12:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116283#M32077</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You've completed what's known as univariate analysis on your data, checking the category of one variable against others one at a time. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It sounds like you're looking to move on to the multivariate stage, looking at multiple variables together, and relationships between them. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The appropriate multivariate model depends on what your research question/hypothesis is and the structure of your data. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you've shown all categorical data, my guess is a log-linear model, but that's a GUESS. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:22:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116283#M32077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T20:22:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116284#M32078</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to study the &lt;STRONG&gt;problems associated&lt;/STRONG&gt; with the&lt;STRONG&gt; type of surgery done.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;when i use a particular type of surgery what effect/problem it is creating???&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Regards&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:29:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116284#M32078</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertrao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T20:29:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116285#M32079</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So your outcome is an indicator if a patient has a problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For me at least I'd need more of an explanation of your data and what you were looking to answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 20:49:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116285#M32079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T20:49:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116286#M32080</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd say consult with a statistician (possibly a biostatistician) now &lt;img id="smileyhappy" class="emoticon emoticon-smileyhappy" src="https://communities.sas.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-happy.png" alt="Smiley Happy" title="Smiley Happy" /&gt;.There really are too many things that would need to be considered and I've seen too many bad&amp;nbsp; medical publications to help produce one. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your local university probably has a consulting services that will be free of charge or low cost.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 21:39:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116286#M32080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-02T21:39:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116287#M32081</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;P value less than 0.05 is statistical significant if your possibility of committing the first mistake&amp;nbsp; is .05 .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That means your H0 hypothesis (Type of Case and Headache are independent ) is not right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;.05 discover there are some correlation between Type of Case and Headache .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recommend you also use corresponding analysis to check this relation more .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ksharp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:21:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-analysis/m-p/116287#M32081</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-05T02:21:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

