<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Automated Model Selection Question in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Automated-Model-Selection-Question/m-p/76908#M22300</link>
    <description>I had posted this in the SAS Macro board, and was told this might've been a better place for this question. It seems like my question was answered, but I wanted to see if this board had any other input.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
With Automated Model Selection (best subsets, forward selection, etc.), I'm having trouble with datasets that have higher order terms or interaction terms. How can I manipulate SAS into taking these variables into consideration? (ie, if Variable 'x' discarded in backwards elimination, then it has to discard Variable 'x^2' and Variable 'x*y')</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-12T15:05:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Automated Model Selection Question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Automated-Model-Selection-Question/m-p/76908#M22300</link>
      <description>I had posted this in the SAS Macro board, and was told this might've been a better place for this question. It seems like my question was answered, but I wanted to see if this board had any other input.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
With Automated Model Selection (best subsets, forward selection, etc.), I'm having trouble with datasets that have higher order terms or interaction terms. How can I manipulate SAS into taking these variables into consideration? (ie, if Variable 'x' discarded in backwards elimination, then it has to discard Variable 'x^2' and Variable 'x*y')</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:05:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Automated-Model-Selection-Question/m-p/76908#M22300</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-12T15:05:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Automated Model Selection Question</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Automated-Model-Selection-Question/m-p/76909#M22301</link>
      <description>First, I'd like to make a recommendation on another statistical technique that many find preferable to stepwise regression or best subsets. The problem is that Least Squares just isn't that good a modelling technique when you have many X variables and they are highly correlated with one another. There are many critiques of stepwise and best subsets on the Internet (and elsewhere) in these situations. &lt;A href="http://groups.google.com/group/comp.soft-sys.sas/search?group=comp.soft-sys.sas&amp;amp;q=stepwise&amp;amp;qt_g=Search+this+group"&gt;Here are some&lt;/A&gt;. A better technique is Partial Least Squares regression, which in SAS is PROC PLS.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you absolutely have to use PROC REG and want interactions and polynomial terms in the model, first create an X matrix in PROC GLMMOD to represent your main effects, interactions and polynomial terms, and then run that through PROC REG. I will note that I have never had much success doing things this way, hence the PROC PLS recommendation.

Message was edited by: Paige</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 17:39:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Automated-Model-Selection-Question/m-p/76909#M22301</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-12T17:39:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

