<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc PLS, NIPALS and missing values in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-NIPALS-and-missing-values/m-p/76849#M22281</link>
    <description>You are right that in theory, the NIPALS algorithm can be run with missing values for some data.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
However, I believe that the PROC PLS implementation of NIPALS doesn't allow for missing values. You have to use MISSING=EM or MISSING=AVG, which as you said, fills in estimated values.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-03-11T16:19:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc PLS, NIPALS and missing values</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-NIPALS-and-missing-values/m-p/76848#M22280</link>
      <description>Hello,&lt;BR /&gt;
I would like to make a PLS regression with the Proc PLS. I have some missing values in my dataset but I thought that the NIPALS algorithm could run with it. By default, it’s not true. There is a MISSING option in the procedure: with MISSING=NONE, observations with any missing variables are excluded from the analysis; with the two others options, AVG and EM, missing values are replaced by estimations. I think that is contradictory with what the NIPALS algorithm allows. Could you correct me if I make a mistake? Otherwise, how is it possible to run the Proc PLS with the NIPALS algorithm and missing values?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
rcas&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
PS : Sorry for my english.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 15:13:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-NIPALS-and-missing-values/m-p/76848#M22280</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-11T15:13:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc PLS, NIPALS and missing values</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-NIPALS-and-missing-values/m-p/76849#M22281</link>
      <description>You are right that in theory, the NIPALS algorithm can be run with missing values for some data.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
However, I believe that the PROC PLS implementation of NIPALS doesn't allow for missing values. You have to use MISSING=EM or MISSING=AVG, which as you said, fills in estimated values.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:19:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-NIPALS-and-missing-values/m-p/76849#M22281</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-11T16:19:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc PLS, NIPALS and missing values</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-NIPALS-and-missing-values/m-p/76850#M22282</link>
      <description>Thanks for the answer.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:06:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Proc-PLS-NIPALS-and-missing-values/m-p/76850#M22282</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-03-12T08:06:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

