<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PROC LOGISTIC: INTERPRETING DUMMY VAR SIGNIFICANCE in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-INTERPRETING-DUMMY-VAR-SIGNIFICANCE/m-p/73429#M21268</link>
    <description>Thanks to those who answered my question as to why SAS would set my B's = 0 for 'redundant' qualitative X's. I should have known this. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Now my questions is,  how do I determine statistical significance of the parameters with B set to 0 since no p-value is given.  Are DEV_WILL and GEN_CORNELL&lt;BR /&gt;
significant? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does the significance of the intercept term imply anything about this? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
OUTPUT&lt;BR /&gt;
Note:	The following parameters have been set to 0, since the variables are a linear combination of other variables as shown.&lt;BR /&gt;
DEV_WILL0 =	Intercept - DEV_SMITH0 - DEV_JONES0&lt;BR /&gt;
GEN_CORNELL0 =	Intercept - GEN_JACKSON0 - GEN_DAVIS0&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks again.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:15:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-02-10T15:15:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC LOGISTIC: INTERPRETING DUMMY VAR SIGNIFICANCE</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-INTERPRETING-DUMMY-VAR-SIGNIFICANCE/m-p/73429#M21268</link>
      <description>Thanks to those who answered my question as to why SAS would set my B's = 0 for 'redundant' qualitative X's. I should have known this. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Now my questions is,  how do I determine statistical significance of the parameters with B set to 0 since no p-value is given.  Are DEV_WILL and GEN_CORNELL&lt;BR /&gt;
significant? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Does the significance of the intercept term imply anything about this? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
OUTPUT&lt;BR /&gt;
Note:	The following parameters have been set to 0, since the variables are a linear combination of other variables as shown.&lt;BR /&gt;
DEV_WILL0 =	Intercept - DEV_SMITH0 - DEV_JONES0&lt;BR /&gt;
GEN_CORNELL0 =	Intercept - GEN_JACKSON0 - GEN_DAVIS0&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks again.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:15:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-INTERPRETING-DUMMY-VAR-SIGNIFICANCE/m-p/73429#M21268</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T15:15:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC LOGISTIC: INTERPRETING DUMMY VAR SIGNIFICANCE</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-INTERPRETING-DUMMY-VAR-SIGNIFICANCE/m-p/73430#M21269</link>
      <description>This issue gets into parameterization, which is hard to explain via computer.  But it helps to ask yourself what question you're trying to answer, which sounds basic, I know, but it's amazing how often that very clearly and very specifically defining the question helps you find the answer.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You ask how you know if CORNELL is significant.  Signficant compared to what?  Remember, CORNELL isn't a continuous variable such as AGE, where you get a parameter estimate and a p-value and that tells you what happens as AGE changes.  Instead, CORNELL is one general.  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The beta and p-value for JACKSON will tell you whether JACKSON is different from CORNELL (or equivalently whether CORNELL is different from JACKSON).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The beta and p-value for DAVIS will tell you whether DAVIS is different from CORNELL (or equivalently whether CORNELL is different from DAVIS).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And you could write a CONTRAST statement to determine whether JACKSON is different from DAVIS.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Those are typically the only kinds of questions I ask in situations like that.  But there is a way to answer the question "Is CORNELL different from all generals combined?" and I don't know what it is right now but perhaps that's not what you really need to know anyway.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:03:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-INTERPRETING-DUMMY-VAR-SIGNIFICANCE/m-p/73430#M21269</guid>
      <dc:creator>n6</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-02-10T16:03:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

