<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic a question for panel data in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/a-question-for-panel-data/m-p/67383#M19268</link>
    <description>I am using Proc panel to regress an unbalanced panel data. I wonder before doing random effect vs fixed effect choice, do I need check heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation? If I need test them, which options in proc panel can help to correct them? Some people say proc panel can automatically give the best estimate. Is it true? Thank you.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:51:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-12-30T03:51:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>a question for panel data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/a-question-for-panel-data/m-p/67383#M19268</link>
      <description>I am using Proc panel to regress an unbalanced panel data. I wonder before doing random effect vs fixed effect choice, do I need check heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation? If I need test them, which options in proc panel can help to correct them? Some people say proc panel can automatically give the best estimate. Is it true? Thank you.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:51:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/a-question-for-panel-data/m-p/67383#M19268</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-12-30T03:51:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

