<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Regression with interval for estimate in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-with-interval-for-estimate/m-p/64615#M18355</link>
    <description>There is a RESTRICT statement in PROC REG, but it doesn't allow "greater than" restrictions, just equality restrictions.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The problem isn't really SAS. The problem is that when you perform a regression with multiple correlated variables (you have 7 variables in your model), least squares regression (not SAS) can have huge variances for your parameter estimates, and because of that, you can get a negative estimate even when you think it should be positive. In this situation, interpreting the coefficients is a meaningless exercise.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Sometimes using Partial Least Squares regression (PROC PLS) can alleviate this problem, but your R-squared from PLS will not be as good as from PROC REG, and there's no guarantee that PLS will provide positive estimates.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-11T12:28:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Regression with interval for estimate</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-with-interval-for-estimate/m-p/64614#M18354</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
This is the regression model i'm using:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
proc reg data=data_regressie4 outest=regressie4 edf;&lt;BR /&gt;
BY ANALYS;&lt;BR /&gt;
model geschaalde_FE = geschaalde_deviation age size total_experience firm_experience aantalsector aantalbedrijf;&lt;BR /&gt;
run;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The problem is that the estimate for geschaalde_deviation should be greater than 0. Is there a way to make sas estimate this model with "geschaalde_deviation" being greater than 0?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks a lot!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 11:58:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-with-interval-for-estimate/m-p/64614#M18354</guid>
      <dc:creator>jebuske</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-11T11:58:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Regression with interval for estimate</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-with-interval-for-estimate/m-p/64615#M18355</link>
      <description>There is a RESTRICT statement in PROC REG, but it doesn't allow "greater than" restrictions, just equality restrictions.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The problem isn't really SAS. The problem is that when you perform a regression with multiple correlated variables (you have 7 variables in your model), least squares regression (not SAS) can have huge variances for your parameter estimates, and because of that, you can get a negative estimate even when you think it should be positive. In this situation, interpreting the coefficients is a meaningless exercise.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Sometimes using Partial Least Squares regression (PROC PLS) can alleviate this problem, but your R-squared from PLS will not be as good as from PROC REG, and there's no guarantee that PLS will provide positive estimates.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 12:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Regression-with-interval-for-estimate/m-p/64615#M18355</guid>
      <dc:creator>Paige</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-11T12:28:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

