<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Interleaving, Match Merging? in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62545#M17781</link>
    <description>What's up guys?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What's the difference between interleaving and Match Merging? It seems to me that, besides the syntax difference, their functions are exactly the same.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
P.S. Don't copy the links to the explanations. ty</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:48:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-14T11:48:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interleaving, Match Merging?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62545#M17781</link>
      <description>What's up guys?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What's the difference between interleaving and Match Merging? It seems to me that, besides the syntax difference, their functions are exactly the same.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
P.S. Don't copy the links to the explanations. ty</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:48:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62545#M17781</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-14T11:48:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interleaving, Match Merging?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62546#M17782</link>
      <description>This sounds like an interview question I've seen many times before - interleave uses SET (with or without a BY) and match-merge uses MERGE statement (with a  BY statement, to achieve the match).  &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
And, the results are very much different - suggest the OP try it with the SASHELP "sample" dataset members and use various self-diagnostic techniques, such as PROC PRINT  and use a PUTLOG _ALL_;  statement in the DATA step where using the SET/MERGE statements.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott Barry&lt;BR /&gt;
SBBWorks, Inc.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Suggested Google advanced search arguments, this topic / post (clearly optional and no doubt extra-credit -- notice no links were contributed, nor harmed with this post-reply):&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
data step programming set merge site:sas.com&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
data step programming by group processing site:sas.com

Message was edited by: sbb</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 14:20:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62546#M17782</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-14T14:20:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interleaving, Match Merging?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62547#M17783</link>
      <description>&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/basess/58133/HTML/default/a001653394.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/basess/58133/HTML/default/a001653394.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/basess/58133/HTML/default/a001318494.htm" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/basess/58133/HTML/default/a001318494.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
yw &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 16:18:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62547#M17783</guid>
      <dc:creator>chang_y_chung_hotmail_com</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-14T16:18:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interleaving, Match Merging?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62548#M17784</link>
      <description>William,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You either already have received the answer to your question or you asked the wrong question.  I'm going to assume the latter although I really can't recall what the following merging type is called.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If you were asking what the difference was between merging with NO by statement, and the equivalent of merging by using two set statements with NO by statement, then I think that the answer is basically none.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
That is, if the following code represents what you were asking:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
data want1;&lt;BR /&gt;
  merge have1 have2;&lt;BR /&gt;
run;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
data want2;&lt;BR /&gt;
  set have1;&lt;BR /&gt;
  set have2;&lt;BR /&gt;
run;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 02:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Interleaving-Match-Merging/m-p/62548#M17784</guid>
      <dc:creator>art297</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-15T02:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

