<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic NLMIXED and GEE in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/NLMIXED-and-GEE/m-p/42563#M11074</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; So long as the clustering variable is explicitly included in the CLASS statement, it should be OK.&amp;nbsp; I worry somewhat about the 'repeated' statement, but I believe you will be using PHYSICIAN as in SUBJECT=PHYSICIAN part.&amp;nbsp; If not, then careful consideration needs to be made as to the possible covariance structures and the effect of coding on them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:50:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-26T11:50:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NLMIXED and GEE</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/NLMIXED-and-GEE/m-p/42562#M11073</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While using PROC NLMIXED&amp;nbsp; or GEE is there a specific way the clustering variable should be coded. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does coding effects the results. For instance say I have&amp;nbsp; subject=PHYSICIAN in my PROC NLMIXED option or repeated subject=PHYSICIAN in PROC GEE will it effect my results or will it create issues with convergence if I code PHYSICIAN as (1,2,3,4) or PHYSICIAN as (64055, 65471,56432).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; If it does effect then how can I change the coding scheme for a variable in SAS. As currently my PHYSICIAN is coded with&amp;nbsp; 5 digit numeric codes (eg physician A has code 64055, physican B has code 65275 and so on). There are 58 physicians (clusters) and the cluster size (number of patients being treated by each physician) varies from 1 to 39.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking forward for your ocmments and suggesitons.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tasneem&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:14:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/NLMIXED-and-GEE/m-p/42562#M11073</guid>
      <dc:creator>Statooed</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-25T14:14:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NLMIXED and GEE</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/NLMIXED-and-GEE/m-p/42563#M11074</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; So long as the clustering variable is explicitly included in the CLASS statement, it should be OK.&amp;nbsp; I worry somewhat about the 'repeated' statement, but I believe you will be using PHYSICIAN as in SUBJECT=PHYSICIAN part.&amp;nbsp; If not, then careful consideration needs to be made as to the possible covariance structures and the effect of coding on them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:50:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/NLMIXED-and-GEE/m-p/42563#M11074</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-26T11:50:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

