<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic DSS5200W - Recfm VB cannot be concatenated with U in SAS Health and Life Sciences</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Health-and-Life-Sciences/DSS5200W-Recfm-VB-cannot-be-concatenated-with-U/m-p/5988#M538</link>
    <description>This message appears when we do a jobscan on jobs using SAS.  We recently upgraded to v9.1.3 from v8.2.06.  Our previous SASAUTOS concatenation's DCB is FB while the new version we recently installed has a DCB of VB.  My question is if its okay for me to re-allocate the autolib dataset from a VBB to an FB?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:57:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2007-12-19T08:57:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DSS5200W - Recfm VB cannot be concatenated with U</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Health-and-Life-Sciences/DSS5200W-Recfm-VB-cannot-be-concatenated-with-U/m-p/5988#M538</link>
      <description>This message appears when we do a jobscan on jobs using SAS.  We recently upgraded to v9.1.3 from v8.2.06.  Our previous SASAUTOS concatenation's DCB is FB while the new version we recently installed has a DCB of VB.  My question is if its okay for me to re-allocate the autolib dataset from a VBB to an FB?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 08:57:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Health-and-Life-Sciences/DSS5200W-Recfm-VB-cannot-be-concatenated-with-U/m-p/5988#M538</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-19T08:57:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DSS5200W - Recfm VB cannot be concatenated with U</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Health-and-Life-Sciences/DSS5200W-Recfm-VB-cannot-be-concatenated-with-U/m-p/5989#M539</link>
      <description>I would recommend the opposite, going from FB to VB.&lt;BR /&gt;
The process of removing any line numbers in 73-80 is simpler than text flowing all the wide code to within cols 1-72&lt;BR /&gt;
VB would also work in the SAS8 context.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
SASAUTOS concatenation can be achieved within the SAS session rather than the JCL. The style is&lt;BR /&gt;
 option sasautos= ( ddname ddn2  "physical DSN"  etc  "..." ) ;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There are a SAS Usage notes on the topic: see&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/11/929.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/kb/11/929.html&lt;/A&gt; and&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/12/199.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/kb/12/199.html&lt;/A&gt; which refers to options S= and S2= which are also involved.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
PeterC</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 14:30:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Health-and-Life-Sciences/DSS5200W-Recfm-VB-cannot-be-concatenated-with-U/m-p/5989#M539</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2007-12-19T14:30:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

