<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed in Graphics Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171078#M6340</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given that data set up, and the already "binned' nature of the data, would yet another binning by week within season make sense?&amp;nbsp; Then you would have 13 repeated measures on each combination of year, season, block and treatment.&amp;nbsp; If you believe that this is something that reflects an interesting approach, I think it would be the best way to incorporate changes over time.&amp;nbsp; The problem I have with both season and day in the model is that the number of observations per season (and per year) isn't consistent because 4 doesn't divide 365 or 366 equally. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An alternative would be to fit day rather than season, and then address season effects through the use of LSMESTIMATE or CONTRAST statements, viewing the season effect as a composite of the day effect.&amp;nbsp; It will require HPMIXED, followed by GLIMMIX to get this to work though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-02-17T16:22:56Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171071#M6333</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed on a field data (RCBD with four treatments (One control vs. three different land uses). The response variable is water table depth (WTD) which is collected every 15-minute. I would like to know which of the two sets of codes is more appropriate to use. I would also welcome any suggestion to improve the set of codes. Seas = Seasons (traditional: winter, spring, summer, and fall), Day = Julian Day, WTD = water table depth averaged over a day. Here are the codes:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;A)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ODS GRAPHICS ON;&lt;BR /&gt;PROC MIXED DATA=WORK.WTDWOR_2014 plots(only)=(ResidualPanel(marginal)) &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PLOTS(MAXPOINTS= 2000000);&lt;BR /&gt;CLASS Block Treat Year Seas Day;&lt;BR /&gt;MODEL WTD = Treat|Year|Seas/ddfm=satterthwaite residual;&lt;BR /&gt;RANDOM Block Block*Treat Block*Treat*Year Block*Treat*Year*Seas;&lt;BR /&gt;LSMEANS Treat Treat*Year Treat*Year*Seas/adjust = tukey;&lt;BR /&gt;RUN;&lt;BR /&gt;ODS GRAPHICS OFF;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;B)&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ODS GRAPHICS ON;&lt;BR /&gt;PROC MIXED DATA=WORK.WTDWOR_2014 plots(only)=(ResidualPanel(marginal)) &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PLOTS(MAXPOINTS= 2000000);&lt;BR /&gt;CLASS Block Treat Year Seas Day;&lt;BR /&gt;MODEL WTD = Treat|Year|Seas Seas(Year) Treat*Seas(Year)/ddfm=satterthwaite residual;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RANDOM Block Block*Treat Block*Treat*Year Block*Treat*Year*Seas;&lt;BR /&gt;LSMEANS Treat Treat*Year Treat*Seas(Year)/adjust = tukey;&lt;BR /&gt;RUN;&lt;BR /&gt;ODS GRAPHICS OFF;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.S. On set of codes B, I was trying to let SAS know that season(Seas) is embedded within a year. Is this correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 21:17:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171071#M6333</guid>
      <dc:creator>TD21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-11T21:17:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171072#M6334</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Not sure if &lt;A __default_attr="455729" __jive_macro_name="user" class="jive_macro jive_macro_user" data-objecttype="3" href="https://communities.sas.com/"&gt;&lt;/A&gt; monitors this forum.&amp;nbsp; This question might get more answers from the folks in the Statistical Procedures Community:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://communities.sas.com/community/support-communities/sas_statistical_procedures"&gt;https://communities.sas.com/community/support-communities/sas_statistical_procedures&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 22:52:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171072#M6334</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-11T22:52:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171073#M6335</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Rick...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2014 23:29:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171073#M6335</guid>
      <dc:creator>TD21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-11T23:29:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171074#M6336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Some interesting points to consider here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; You include DAY as a class variable, but do not use it in the model.&amp;nbsp; As the analysis now stands, you are averaging over all days, even though they are in different years and seasons.&amp;nbsp; This may lead to problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; Of the two models presented, I would think they are identical.&amp;nbsp; Your code for the LSMEANS is certainly appropriate in either case, given how SAS models nested factors (see the documentation on this)&amp;nbsp; SEAS(YEAR) and SEAS*YEAR set up exactly the same matrix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3.&amp;nbsp; I guess my main concern is that this is a repeated measures design of some complexity, and the correlations within a plot over time are not being modeled.&amp;nbsp; It may be that this just can't be done easily.&amp;nbsp; You may wish to think of season-day, if the measurements are spaced out at the same times within each season for each year.&amp;nbsp; However, I have a strong hunch that this level of complexity may not be amenable to modeling, due to memory and other constraints.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let us know what you think.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 12:20:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171074#M6336</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-12T12:20:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171075#M6337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Steve. As you may have recognized, I am collecting the data every 15 minutes. I am both interested in main effects and simple effects (of treatments on WTD on annual basis, and on seasonal basis within a given year, if any). I average 240 samples of 15-minute WTD data to come up with an average for a day of a given season per treatment. The raw data are already on in terms of average per day and not the 15-minute interval. Analyzing by season (traditional 4 seasons) means averaging 120 days of WTD into one value per treatment. My point is, I could add a repeated statement in the model; however, the fact that I am averaging the data from 15-minute interval (240) to daily (120) to season makes the autocorrelation issue less of an issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are right with point number 2. I looked at the covariance parameters estimates and fit statistics (e.g. AIC values), the two models were very similar. I just would like to tell the model that DAY is nested within SEAS, and SEAS within Year and I am not sure if I am doing it right. Based on your comment about similarity in matrices, I think I am close.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You mentioned about DAY. Any suggestion as to how to incorporate that into the model (DAY as nested into SEAS) as a code?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, thanks for your time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 14:44:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171075#M6337</guid>
      <dc:creator>TD21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-12T14:44:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171076#M6338</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;TD,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The nested terms in your model are already included when you 'pipe' the fixed effects, so I am now in favor of Model A (&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;foolish&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you have the computing power to handle DAY as a repeated measure, I would try it.&amp;nbsp; How many days of data do you have?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Things to consider:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I would shift to HPMIXED, and then port to GLIMMIX for comparisons of lsmeans (see EX. 46.3 in the HPMIXED documentation)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I would index the days within season, rather than using the Julian date.&amp;nbsp; If they don't align, then forget using a repeated measures approach.&amp;nbsp; If they do align, or would with only minor shifts, then code that looks like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CLASS Treat Year Seas Day Block Plotid;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; MODEL WTD = Treat|Year|Seas|Day ;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RANDOM Block Block*Treat Block*Treat*Year Block*Treat*Year*Seas;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; REPEATED Day/subject=plotid(block treat year seas) type=AR(1);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Get everything in ODS datasets and then port it all into GLIMMIX.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 18:17:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171076#M6338</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T18:17:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171077#M6339</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 92 days in 2009; 365 x 3 = 1095 days in 2010, 2011, and 2013; and 366 in 2012. So in each treatment I have 1553 days of data. By the way, I didn't include Julian date in my dataset but rather Julian Day. In short, I have a column for year, separate column for season, and day. For example in 2010, I have column/variable for year which is 2010, another column for season (winter, spring, summer, and fall) and another season for Day (1 to 365). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:26:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171077#M6339</guid>
      <dc:creator>TD21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-14T19:26:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171078#M6340</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Given that data set up, and the already "binned' nature of the data, would yet another binning by week within season make sense?&amp;nbsp; Then you would have 13 repeated measures on each combination of year, season, block and treatment.&amp;nbsp; If you believe that this is something that reflects an interesting approach, I think it would be the best way to incorporate changes over time.&amp;nbsp; The problem I have with both season and day in the model is that the number of observations per season (and per year) isn't consistent because 4 doesn't divide 365 or 366 equally. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An alternative would be to fit day rather than season, and then address season effects through the use of LSMESTIMATE or CONTRAST statements, viewing the season effect as a composite of the day effect.&amp;nbsp; It will require HPMIXED, followed by GLIMMIX to get this to work though.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 16:22:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171078#M6340</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-02-17T16:22:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171079#M6341</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steve:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I followed your latest advice (add week, analyze with HPMIXED then port to GLIMMIX). I seemed to have successfully run HPMIXED, but not with GLIMMIX. The error was about PARMSDATA which I highlighted below. Any suggestion how to fix this error? Pardon the long post. I just wanted to give you as much background information as I can.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TD&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;55&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PROC HPMIXED DATA = WORK.WTDWOR_Final2014; *plots(only)=(ResidualPanel(marginal)&lt;BR /&gt;NOTE: Writing HTML Body file: sashtml1.htm&lt;BR /&gt;56&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; StudentPanel(conditional)) PLOTS(MAXPOINTS= 2000000);&lt;BR /&gt;57&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CLASS Block Treat Year Seas Week Day;&lt;BR /&gt;58&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; MODEL WTD = Treat|Year|Seas|Week;&lt;BR /&gt;59&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RANDOM INT Treat/SUBJECT=Block;&lt;BR /&gt;60&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; REPEATED DAY/SUBJECT=Block*Treat*Year*Seas*Week type=ar(1) R;&lt;BR /&gt;61&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; TEST Treat|Year|Seas|Week;&lt;BR /&gt;62&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ODS OUTPUT COVPARMS=HPMEstimate;&lt;BR /&gt;63&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RUN;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NOTE: 129 observations are excluded because of: missing response values (n=129).&lt;BR /&gt;NOTE: Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.&lt;BR /&gt;NOTE: The data set WORK.HPMESTIMATE has 4 observations and 3 variables.&lt;BR /&gt;NOTE: PROCEDURE HPMIXED used (Total process time):&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; real time&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2:32:48.21&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cpu time&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1:24:56.25&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;64&lt;BR /&gt;65&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ODS GRAPHICS ON;&lt;BR /&gt;66&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PROC GLIMMIX DATA = WORK.WTDWOR_Final2014;&lt;BR /&gt;67&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CLASS Block Treat Year Seas Week Day;&lt;BR /&gt;68&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; MODEL WTD = Treat|Year|Seas|Week;&lt;BR /&gt;69&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RANDOM INT Treat/SUBJECT=Block;&lt;BR /&gt;70&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PARMS/PDATA=HPMEstimate hold=1,2 noiter;&lt;BR /&gt;71&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; LSMEANS Treat|Year|Seas|Week/ADJUST=Tukey;&lt;BR /&gt;72&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RUN;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NOTE: Some observations are not used in the analysis because of: missing response values (n=129).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ERROR: The PARMSDATA= data set must have either 2 more or 1 less observations.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;NOTE: The SAS System stopped processing this step because of errors.&lt;BR /&gt;NOTE: PROCEDURE GLIMMIX used (Total process time):&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; real time&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 40.35 seconds&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cpu time&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 37.02 seconds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2014 03:53:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171079#M6341</guid>
      <dc:creator>TD21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-06T03:53:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ANOVA using SAS 9.3 Proc Mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171080#M6342</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks to me like you aren't fitting the same model in GLIMMIX.&amp;nbsp; Try adding a second random statement&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;RANDOM DAY/residual SUBJECT=Block*Treat*Year*Seas*Week type=ar(1) R;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and changing the PARMS statement to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PARMS/PDATA=HPMEstimate hold=1,2,3,4 noiter;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 17:48:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/ANOVA-using-SAS-9-3-Proc-Mixed/m-p/171080#M6342</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-09T17:48:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

