<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why can't overlayequated be a choice in SGPLOT in Graphics Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509069#M17322</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Glad to know you find SGPlot useful.&amp;nbsp; The page referred by RW9 explains the special needs of OverlayEquated.&amp;nbsp; It would be cleaner to write a new procedure like SGEQUATED than to allow for all the exceptions.&amp;nbsp; The original idea was for SG procedures to cover the 80% of graph use cases that need 20% of the GTL features.&amp;nbsp; And tmplout saves you a lot of work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jay54</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-31T11:59:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why can't overlayequated be a choice in SGPLOT</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509053#M17320</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi, I have sevreal use cases where i need equated axes. There are som special cases where the aspect option in SGplot works. However I constantly find that I create the plot in SGPLOT and then use the tmplout&amp;nbsp; option to create the graph template. The only thing i really do is to change layout overlay to layout overlayequated.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a reason why this cannot be an option on SGPLOT?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:22:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509053#M17320</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaalNavestad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T11:22:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why can't overlayequated be a choice in SGPLOT</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509064#M17321</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please review the manual:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://go.documentation.sas.com/?docsetId=grstatgraph&amp;amp;docsetTarget=p1o6jpw47ay3pin0z8jwcckzoxsk.htm&amp;amp;docsetVersion=9.4&amp;amp;locale=en" target="_blank"&gt;https://go.documentation.sas.com/?docsetId=grstatgraph&amp;amp;docsetTarget=p1o6jpw47ay3pin0z8jwcckzoxsk.htm&amp;amp;docsetVersion=9.4&amp;amp;locale=en&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:44:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509064#M17321</guid>
      <dc:creator>RW9</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T11:44:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why can't overlayequated be a choice in SGPLOT</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509069#M17322</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Glad to know you find SGPlot useful.&amp;nbsp; The page referred by RW9 explains the special needs of OverlayEquated.&amp;nbsp; It would be cleaner to write a new procedure like SGEQUATED than to allow for all the exceptions.&amp;nbsp; The original idea was for SG procedures to cover the 80% of graph use cases that need 20% of the GTL features.&amp;nbsp; And tmplout saves you a lot of work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 11:59:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509069#M17322</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jay54</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T11:59:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why can't overlayequated be a choice in SGPLOT</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509090#M17324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/graphicallyspeaking/2017/07/27/advanced-ods-graphics-equated-axes-and-the-aspect-ratio/&amp;nbsp;" target="_blank"&gt;https://blogs.sas.com/content/graphicallyspeaking/2017/07/27/advanced-ods-graphics-equated-axes-and-the-aspect-ratio/&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In some cases, the ASPECT option is sufficient to equate axes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 13:12:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509090#M17324</guid>
      <dc:creator>WarrenKuhfeld</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T13:12:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why can't overlayequated be a choice in SGPLOT</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509116#M17325</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Warren, yes aspect solves some cases, but not the cases I work with. I think Sanjay actually answers my question. The blog post yo linked is really good. I actually use a lot of thye code and ideas from the post daily.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:12:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509116#M17325</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaalNavestad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T14:12:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why can't overlayequated be a choice in SGPLOT</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509118#M17326</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509118#M17326</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaalNavestad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T14:12:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why can't overlayequated be a choice in SGPLOT</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509121#M17327</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Sanjay, yes I find Sgplot really useful. Especially the more or less endless possibilities for overlaying different plots. I see your point of needing a new procedure, and maybe it is wise to keep as is.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The option of tmplout saves a lot of work as you kindly say.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:24:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Graphics-Programming/Why-can-t-overlayequated-be-a-choice-in-SGPLOT/m-p/509121#M17327</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaalNavestad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-31T14:24:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

