<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC Logistic vs GUI in SAS Enterprise Guide</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/PROC-Logistic-vs-GUI/m-p/29168#M4027</link>
    <description>The short answer is "no."  I've never seen one.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The EG GUI pretty much follows the 80/20 rule for the statistical procedures.  You can do 80% with the point and click interface and you need to add code for the remaining 20%.  A few of the very complex procedures (MIXED, for instance) have much less than the 80% functionality in EG.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The EG developers did put the hooks in so it is easy to add most of the functionality that is not in the point-n-click interface.  From within the task, click "preview code" and then click 'insert code.'</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:02:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Doc_Duke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2008-07-04T03:02:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC Logistic vs GUI</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/PROC-Logistic-vs-GUI/m-p/29167#M4026</link>
      <description>I'm doing some logistic regression analysis in EG (4.1), and was just wondering if anyone knew the difference between using a code module that calls PROC LOGISTIC and using the EG window-based method. I know the EG method just generates a PROC LOGISTIC call, but from a quick look at the help files it seems that there are a few options that aren't incorporated into the GUI. Is there a concise list of which options are only available if I write the code myself?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 01:20:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/PROC-Logistic-vs-GUI/m-p/29167#M4026</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-04T01:20:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC Logistic vs GUI</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/PROC-Logistic-vs-GUI/m-p/29168#M4027</link>
      <description>The short answer is "no."  I've never seen one.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The EG GUI pretty much follows the 80/20 rule for the statistical procedures.  You can do 80% with the point and click interface and you need to add code for the remaining 20%.  A few of the very complex procedures (MIXED, for instance) have much less than the 80% functionality in EG.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The EG developers did put the hooks in so it is easy to add most of the functionality that is not in the point-n-click interface.  From within the task, click "preview code" and then click 'insert code.'</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:02:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/PROC-Logistic-vs-GUI/m-p/29168#M4027</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Duke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-04T03:02:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC Logistic vs GUI</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/PROC-Logistic-vs-GUI/m-p/29169#M4028</link>
      <description>Of course, I forgot about the code hooks. Of course, it still requires you to know or be able to learn all the bits of PROC LOGISTIC anyway, but that's not necessarily a bad thing (after all, it's good practice to know how your code is doing what it's doing, instead of just blindly hoping that it will do it right).&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks for that!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 07:24:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/PROC-Logistic-vs-GUI/m-p/29169#M4028</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2008-07-04T07:24:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

