<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Your thoughts on using EG in SAS Enterprise Guide</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/Your-thoughts-on-using-EG/m-p/1067#M309</link>
    <description>Fellow EG’ers:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Coming from a primarily mainframe and unix SAS background, I’m used to writing my own code to get things done. As I transition to EG on Windows, I’m quickly realizing that certain things we took for granted on the “batch” platforms don’t necessarily (or easily) apply here – scheduling jobs,  configuration, system commands, etc. &lt;BR /&gt;
I’d like to get a sense of how other folks are using EG. &lt;BR /&gt;
Are folks using EG for canned reporting or for full blown production stuff? Most of my users are relatively new to SAS so I would like to let them know what to expect or otherwise.&lt;BR /&gt;
I’m beginning to think that even though EG is quite a powerful and intuitive tool, its’ batch processing capabilities can not match the unix or mainframe platforms. Are there additional tools that should be considered – such as scheduling, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;
One of the many features I like about EG is that I can start my graphs or tabulates using the menus, and then customize them with additional code. Sometimes, it beats writing it all from scratch.&lt;BR /&gt;
Your thoughts?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
Nori</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-07-19T16:49:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Your thoughts on using EG</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/Your-thoughts-on-using-EG/m-p/1067#M309</link>
      <description>Fellow EG’ers:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Coming from a primarily mainframe and unix SAS background, I’m used to writing my own code to get things done. As I transition to EG on Windows, I’m quickly realizing that certain things we took for granted on the “batch” platforms don’t necessarily (or easily) apply here – scheduling jobs,  configuration, system commands, etc. &lt;BR /&gt;
I’d like to get a sense of how other folks are using EG. &lt;BR /&gt;
Are folks using EG for canned reporting or for full blown production stuff? Most of my users are relatively new to SAS so I would like to let them know what to expect or otherwise.&lt;BR /&gt;
I’m beginning to think that even though EG is quite a powerful and intuitive tool, its’ batch processing capabilities can not match the unix or mainframe platforms. Are there additional tools that should be considered – such as scheduling, etc.&lt;BR /&gt;
One of the many features I like about EG is that I can start my graphs or tabulates using the menus, and then customize them with additional code. Sometimes, it beats writing it all from scratch.&lt;BR /&gt;
Your thoughts?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
Nori</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jul 2006 16:49:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Enterprise-Guide/Your-thoughts-on-using-EG/m-p/1067#M309</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-07-19T16:49:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

