<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CI_RESPONSE_HISTORY for subjects dropped during post MA activities in SAS Customer Intelligence</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CI-RESPONSE-HISTORY-for-subjects-dropped-during-post-MA/m-p/419646#M705</link>
    <description>Normally we'd advise using CONTACT_HISTORY_STATUS_CD on the CI_CONTACT_HISTORY table to update records that turned out to not actually be contacts, and reserve use of CI_RESPONSE_HISTORY for actions the customer takes intentionally. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You could certainly handle it the way you described, of course, but I wouldn't consider it as clear from a data perspective.</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shill</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-08T17:50:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CI_RESPONSE_HISTORY for subjects dropped during post MA activities</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CI-RESPONSE-HISTORY-for-subjects-dropped-during-post-MA/m-p/419241#M704</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you use CI_RESPONSE_HISTORY for drops of subjects such as invalid mailing address detected at a printer or an email suppression at an ESP? Do you filter these records out when using it in the infomap for future campaigns?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 16:36:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CI-RESPONSE-HISTORY-for-subjects-dropped-during-post-MA/m-p/419241#M704</guid>
      <dc:creator>pcapazzi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-07T16:36:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CI_RESPONSE_HISTORY for subjects dropped during post MA activities</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CI-RESPONSE-HISTORY-for-subjects-dropped-during-post-MA/m-p/419646#M705</link>
      <description>Normally we'd advise using CONTACT_HISTORY_STATUS_CD on the CI_CONTACT_HISTORY table to update records that turned out to not actually be contacts, and reserve use of CI_RESPONSE_HISTORY for actions the customer takes intentionally. &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;You could certainly handle it the way you described, of course, but I wouldn't consider it as clear from a data perspective.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 17:50:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CI-RESPONSE-HISTORY-for-subjects-dropped-during-post-MA/m-p/419646#M705</guid>
      <dc:creator>shill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-08T17:50:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

