<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CDM - CI CELL PAKCAGE counts changed slightly in SAS Customer Intelligence</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CDM-CI-CELL-PAKCAGE-counts-changed-slightly/m-p/365765#M474</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you. I heard back from our IT who had said they are populating the field I was inquiring about with the counts of agents at the point where we re-publish reporting data and that previously the field was not populated by CIS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pcapazzi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-09T17:01:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CDM - CI CELL PAKCAGE counts changed slightly</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CDM-CI-CELL-PAKCAGE-counts-changed-slightly/m-p/365707#M472</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have a process where we return to a campaign and update a campaign level attribute and then re-publish the campaign without executing it. This is so that an external process can be kicked off.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However, in reconciling counts between our initial reports and counts in the CDM weeks after the execution there is a discrepancy. Over time there are subjects that will be removed from the tables CIS works with. However... I think that when we re-publish a campaign weeks after execution (and we do not re-execute) that the CI CELL PACKAGE table may be getting updated counts at that time. Is this a valid assumption? If it is valid is it updating counts from the contact history table or from the infomap? Note: out contact history table is updated weekly to remove invalid agents. The same is done to the underlying tables that the infomap uses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Campaign 1 has a single segment. There were 100,000 subjects at run-time and 100,000 customer were mailed. After the mailing has gone out we revisit the campaign (say 1 month has passed) to set a variable that the campaign is 'done' and we hit publish reporting data.&amp;nbsp;Another month passes and we are reviewing the counts and see that CI CELL PACKAGE&amp;nbsp;has a TOTAL_MARKETING_CONTACT_CNT of 99,998.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We are using CIS 6.4&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 14:53:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CDM-CI-CELL-PAKCAGE-counts-changed-slightly/m-p/365707#M472</guid>
      <dc:creator>pcapazzi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-09T14:53:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CDM - CI CELL PAKCAGE counts changed slightly</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CDM-CI-CELL-PAKCAGE-counts-changed-slightly/m-p/365762#M473</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That column was actually removed in 6.3. There may be a replacement view sitting on top of it that's querying the CH table directly, so if you have updated CH status codes in there, it might explain the change.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Historically, that column was only updated when you published, and wasn't ever maintained so that it properly reflected failed contacts, and the other corresponding TOTAL_*_CNT columns required ongoing ETL to update as well. Since the aggregation is done automatically on the fly for the VA reports that&amp;nbsp;now ship with the product, it was decided that these misleading fields should be removed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 16:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CDM-CI-CELL-PAKCAGE-counts-changed-slightly/m-p/365762#M473</guid>
      <dc:creator>shill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-09T16:28:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CDM - CI CELL PAKCAGE counts changed slightly</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CDM-CI-CELL-PAKCAGE-counts-changed-slightly/m-p/365765#M474</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you. I heard back from our IT who had said they are populating the field I was inquiring about with the counts of agents at the point where we re-publish reporting data and that previously the field was not populated by CIS.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:01:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/CDM-CI-CELL-PAKCAGE-counts-changed-slightly/m-p/365765#M474</guid>
      <dc:creator>pcapazzi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-09T17:01:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

