<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Which SAS server to install CI360 Direct Agent in SAS Customer Intelligence</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/Which-SAS-server-to-install-CI360-Direct-Agent/m-p/894438#M1940</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/437099"&gt;@alko13&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, it best fits on the midtier. Having said that, when comparing Engage Direct to other 9.4 based applications, much of the solution is cloud based (for example the UI, identity,&amp;nbsp; authentication authorisation, scheduling as a few examples). Consequently much of the traditonal 9.4 workload is not using the main components of 9.4 for the heavy work, but rather a very light purpose. We find many installations are co-locating all 3 tiers because metadata and midtier are so lightly used or perhaps on 2 tiers not 3.&amp;nbsp; The architecture decisions will depend on your implementations usage, workload and organisation's IT standards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;James&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 08:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JamesAnderson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-09-15T08:27:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Which SAS server to install CI360 Direct Agent</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/Which-SAS-server-to-install-CI360-Direct-Agent/m-p/894429#M1938</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am&amp;nbsp; reading about CI360 Engage Direct as a preparation for future implementation.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I came about CI 360 Direct Agent. Where is this usually installed or Best Practice where this should be located in a 9.4 environment? Metadata Compute or Midtier Server?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 05:53:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/Which-SAS-server-to-install-CI360-Direct-Agent/m-p/894429#M1938</guid>
      <dc:creator>alko13</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-15T05:53:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Which SAS server to install CI360 Direct Agent</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/Which-SAS-server-to-install-CI360-Direct-Agent/m-p/894438#M1940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/437099"&gt;@alko13&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;, it best fits on the midtier. Having said that, when comparing Engage Direct to other 9.4 based applications, much of the solution is cloud based (for example the UI, identity,&amp;nbsp; authentication authorisation, scheduling as a few examples). Consequently much of the traditonal 9.4 workload is not using the main components of 9.4 for the heavy work, but rather a very light purpose. We find many installations are co-locating all 3 tiers because metadata and midtier are so lightly used or perhaps on 2 tiers not 3.&amp;nbsp; The architecture decisions will depend on your implementations usage, workload and organisation's IT standards.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;James&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2023 08:27:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Customer-Intelligence/Which-SAS-server-to-install-CI360-Direct-Agent/m-p/894438#M1940</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesAnderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-09-15T08:27:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

