<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SAS Multiple Cuncurrent Upgraddes in Administration and Deployment</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116765#M1159</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;LinusH:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;New server might be fun.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have run a number of our jobs using 9.3 on our current server.&amp;nbsp; Since we create a lot of formatted Excel spreadsheets and HTML documents, I've noticed that the "cosmetics" of the results change so we just can't "eyeball" the reports to insure they are the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:45:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OS2Rules</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-23T14:45:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SAS Multiple Cuncurrent Upgraddes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116763#M1157</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are planning to:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Upgrade from 9.1 to 9.3,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Upgrade from 32 bit to 64 bit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Upgrade from a teeny tiny server to a great big server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All at the same time (it is a "management decision").&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently run 9.3 on one of our development boxes and have found (and resolved) a few minor problems.&amp;nbsp; I would like to try&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;to avoid any major problems with this conversion, if possible.&amp;nbsp; We have a boat load of production jobs that currently run in our&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;9.1 environment - what would be the "best practice" for testing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any notes / comments / experiences that they would like to share?&amp;nbsp; I would appreciate anything that would&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;make my life easier.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:11:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116763#M1157</guid>
      <dc:creator>OS2Rules</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T13:11:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Multiple Cuncurrent Upgraddes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116764#M1158</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;About the migration itself, there are lots of information on support.sas.com.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Apart from that - new server sounds great. Just run your jobs (and applications) in paralel and compare the results...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 13:51:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116764#M1158</guid>
      <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T13:51:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Multiple Cuncurrent Upgraddes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116765#M1159</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;LinusH:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;New server might be fun.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have run a number of our jobs using 9.3 on our current server.&amp;nbsp; Since we create a lot of formatted Excel spreadsheets and HTML documents, I've noticed that the "cosmetics" of the results change so we just can't "eyeball" the reports to insure they are the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:45:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116765#M1159</guid>
      <dc:creator>OS2Rules</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T14:45:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Multiple Cuncurrent Upgraddes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116766#M1160</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Check out Chris H's comments on 64 bit SAS:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="http://blogs.sas.com/content/sasdummy/2012/05/01/64-bit-gotchas/" title="http://blogs.sas.com/content/sasdummy/2012/05/01/64-bit-gotchas/"&gt; The top gotchas when moving to 64-bit SAS for Windows - The SAS Dummy&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:12:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Administration-and-Deployment/SAS-Multiple-Cuncurrent-Upgraddes/m-p/116766#M1160</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Duke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-24T19:12:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

