<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Issue verifying default rate tables in SAS IFRS 9 in SAS Risk Management</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Risk-Management/Issue-verifying-default-rate-tables-in-SAS-IFRS-9/m-p/986530#M556</link>
    <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently working on default rate analysis within the SAS IFRS 9 framework and I am facing an issue reconciling the calculated default rates with the values available in the IFRS 9 data tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically, I would like to understand which standard SAS IFRS 9 tables should be checked to validate historical and cohort‑based default rates (e.g., performing population vs. new defaults). At the moment, the default rates I am deriving do not fully align with what is stored or reported in the model outputs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could anyone advise on:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The key IFRS 9 tables used for default rate / PD monitoring&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How default events are typically captured and aggregated in these tables&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Any common pitfalls when validating default rates in SAS IFRS 9&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guidance or best practices would be highly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Musheer1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-20T08:22:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issue verifying default rate tables in SAS IFRS 9</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Risk-Management/Issue-verifying-default-rate-tables-in-SAS-IFRS-9/m-p/986530#M556</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently working on default rate analysis within the SAS IFRS 9 framework and I am facing an issue reconciling the calculated default rates with the values available in the IFRS 9 data tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically, I would like to understand which standard SAS IFRS 9 tables should be checked to validate historical and cohort‑based default rates (e.g., performing population vs. new defaults). At the moment, the default rates I am deriving do not fully align with what is stored or reported in the model outputs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could anyone advise on:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The key IFRS 9 tables used for default rate / PD monitoring&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;How default events are typically captured and aggregated in these tables&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Any common pitfalls when validating default rates in SAS IFRS 9&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guidance or best practices would be highly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 08:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Risk-Management/Issue-verifying-default-rate-tables-in-SAS-IFRS-9/m-p/986530#M556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Musheer1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-20T08:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

