<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Reference in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396496#M95739</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13879"&gt;@Reeza&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can a reviewer judge a paper if they have no statistical expertise?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If they dont have any statistical expertise, then shouldnt they not critique on something they have no knowledge on to back their comments? Basic statistical tests are usually learned in school, I really dont see why we need to provide references for them. I didn't use a reference, and if I were to provide one, it would not reflect the books I used to learn those methods years and years ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also - I did really like the seeing theory website, thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Melk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-15T21:15:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Reference</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396449#M95711</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have reviewers asking me for a stat reference! I used basic stats in SAS, like t-test, wilcoxon, kolomogorov-smirnov, and ANOVA. Any comprehensive stat book references anyone can recommend. This is just based of of my knowledge, i dont understand why a reference is requested for these.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:04:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396449#M95711</guid>
      <dc:creator>Melk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-15T19:04:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Reference</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396456#M95713</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How can a reviewer judge a paper if they have no statistical expertise?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I like the &lt;A href="http://www.statsoft.com/Textbook" target="_blank"&gt;statsoft.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;and this is pretty cool:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://students.brown.edu/seeing-theory/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://students.brown.edu/seeing-theory/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 19:16:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396456#M95713</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-15T19:16:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Reference</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396493#M95737</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;A reference book or a "how to"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I like the "CRC Handbook of table for Probablity and Statistics" published by The Chemical Rubber Company&amp;nbsp;as a reference.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:12:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396493#M95737</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-15T21:12:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Comprehensive Statistical Analysis Reference</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396496#M95739</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13879"&gt;@Reeza&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can a reviewer judge a paper if they have no statistical expertise?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If they dont have any statistical expertise, then shouldnt they not critique on something they have no knowledge on to back their comments? Basic statistical tests are usually learned in school, I really dont see why we need to provide references for them. I didn't use a reference, and if I were to provide one, it would not reflect the books I used to learn those methods years and years ago.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also - I did really like the seeing theory website, thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Sep 2017 21:15:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Comprehensive-Statistical-Analysis-Reference/m-p/396496#M95739</guid>
      <dc:creator>Melk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-15T21:15:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

