<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SAS data file size comparing to Excel file size in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS-data-file-size-comparing-to-Excel-file-size/m-p/39423#M7983</link>
    <description>And why is this important?  If you are concerned about space usage, consider the SAS system option COMPRESS=YES, however the results will be data-dependent.  And consider that character versus numeric data stored by each could have an impact on size.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott Barry&lt;BR /&gt;
SBBWorks, Inc.</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:23:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sbb</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-01T18:23:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SAS data file size comparing to Excel file size</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS-data-file-size-comparing-to-Excel-file-size/m-p/39422#M7982</link>
      <description>If the data are the same, when the data is in a SAS data set format, the file size is always bigger than if the data is saved in Excel right? Anyone know why? Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:54:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS-data-file-size-comparing-to-Excel-file-size/m-p/39422#M7982</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-01T17:54:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS data file size comparing to Excel file size</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS-data-file-size-comparing-to-Excel-file-size/m-p/39423#M7983</link>
      <description>And why is this important?  If you are concerned about space usage, consider the SAS system option COMPRESS=YES, however the results will be data-dependent.  And consider that character versus numeric data stored by each could have an impact on size.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Scott Barry&lt;BR /&gt;
SBBWorks, Inc.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:23:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS-data-file-size-comparing-to-Excel-file-size/m-p/39423#M7983</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-01T18:23:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS data file size comparing to Excel file size</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS-data-file-size-comparing-to-Excel-file-size/m-p/39424#M7984</link>
      <description>You are comparing apples and oranges here really.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Sas has to fit database usage requirements like:&lt;BR /&gt;
-maintain dataset header information, &lt;BR /&gt;
-maintain variable metadata (formats, etc), &lt;BR /&gt;
-allow instantaneous direct access to any record, &lt;BR /&gt;
-use fixed length storage (unless you request compression)&lt;BR /&gt;
-allow hooks for aging, integrity constraints, index usage&lt;BR /&gt;
-etc.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Excel doesn't do any of that, it just stores in whatever (probably somewhat compressed) format it sees fit that opens the file in a quick fashion. None of the constraints above apply (but others do, like loading the whole file in one go), as the usage is totally different.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
As I said, apples and oranges.  &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:01:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS-data-file-size-comparing-to-Excel-file-size/m-p/39424#M7984</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisNZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-04T03:01:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

