<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: duplicates in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/duplicates/m-p/327204#M72972</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Duplicates are easy, close is not. The problem with close is that you literally need to compare each address to all other addresses to determine closenes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cleaning addresses is not fun, but look at some papers on LexJansen.com for some methods to standardize the data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-01-24T22:00:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>duplicates</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/duplicates/m-p/327202#M72970</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we won't to flag records that have either duplicate names or names that are close (ie missing the JR or SR or MS vs MRS).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we always want to do this for addresses.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Louise&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 21:57:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/duplicates/m-p/327202#M72970</guid>
      <dc:creator>lu2kaseff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-24T21:57:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: duplicates</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/duplicates/m-p/327204#M72972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Duplicates are easy, close is not. The problem with close is that you literally need to compare each address to all other addresses to determine closenes.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Cleaning addresses is not fun, but look at some papers on LexJansen.com for some methods to standardize the data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2017 22:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/duplicates/m-p/327204#M72972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-24T22:00:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: duplicates</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/duplicates/m-p/327287#M72997</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If the task is critical, and you need to do this a lot, you might want to take look at SAS Data Management Studio.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:40:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/duplicates/m-p/327287#M72997</guid>
      <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-01-25T08:40:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

