<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: merging datasets in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/merging-datasets/m-p/306168#M65433</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The choice usualy depends on the result you want:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Is there a one-to-one match, a many-to-one match, or a many-to-many match&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Do you want matches only, or do you want some (or all) of the mismatches?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It might also depend on your skill with the DATA step vs. SQL.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The bottom line is you have to describe the inputs and outputs at least a little bit.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 03:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Astounding</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-21T03:18:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>merging datasets</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/merging-datasets/m-p/306150#M65427</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In which senario we should use proc sql over data step while merging two dataset? If I have a dataset with 2 million records and other has only 200 records. which method should I use while joining these two tables?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 02:10:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/merging-datasets/m-p/306150#M65427</guid>
      <dc:creator>shivkr</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-21T02:10:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: merging datasets</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/merging-datasets/m-p/306168#M65433</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The choice usualy depends on the result you want:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Is there a one-to-one match, a many-to-one match, or a many-to-many match&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Do you want matches only, or do you want some (or all) of the mismatches?&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It might also depend on your skill with the DATA step vs. SQL.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The bottom line is you have to describe the inputs and outputs at least a little bit.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 03:18:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/merging-datasets/m-p/306168#M65433</guid>
      <dc:creator>Astounding</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-21T03:18:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: merging datasets</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/merging-datasets/m-p/306170#M65434</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There's no hard and fast rule. And it isn't only between SQL and data step, hash objects and formats can also be options for lookups.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In general, a many to many merge is often best done in SQL. Everything else has multiple options.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 03:29:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/merging-datasets/m-p/306170#M65434</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-21T03:29:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

