<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SD=0인 One sample t-test 계산 시 Proc ttest vs Proc univariate의 결과 차이 관련 문의 in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SD-0%EC%9D%B8-One-sample-t-test-%EA%B3%84%EC%82%B0-%EC%8B%9C-Proc-ttest-vs-Proc-univariate%EC%9D%98-%EA%B2%B0%EA%B3%BC/m-p/971746#M377384</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;SD=0인 데이터를 Proc ttest로도 구해보고, Proc univariate으로도 구해보았는데, 결과가 다르게 나왔습니다.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Proc univariate 결과 : p-value 계산 안됨&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Hanwoo_0-1753943610783.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/108651iB5C111149E3D5821/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Hanwoo_0-1753943610783.png" alt="Hanwoo_0-1753943610783.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Proc t-test 결과: p-value &amp;lt;.0001로 계산이 됨.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Hanwoo_1-1753943655035.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/108652iCAE01D520E57A71E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Hanwoo_1-1753943655035.png" alt="Hanwoo_1-1753943655035.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SD=0이면 수학적으로 one-sample t-test의 결과는 계산이 안 되는게 맞다고 생각되는데, 왜 Proc t-test를 했을 땐 &amp;lt;.0001로 결과가 나오는 건가요?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;어떤 Procedure를 쓰나에 따라 결과가 다르게 나오다니..&amp;nbsp; Proc t-test 문헌을 나름 꼼꼼히 살펴봤는데도, sd=0일 때 p-value가 계산이 된 이유가 이해가 안 가 질문 남겼습니다.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:37:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Hanwoo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-31T06:37:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SD=0인 One sample t-test 계산 시 Proc ttest vs Proc univariate의 결과 차이 관련 문의</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SD-0%EC%9D%B8-One-sample-t-test-%EA%B3%84%EC%82%B0-%EC%8B%9C-Proc-ttest-vs-Proc-univariate%EC%9D%98-%EA%B2%B0%EA%B3%BC/m-p/971746#M377384</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;SD=0인 데이터를 Proc ttest로도 구해보고, Proc univariate으로도 구해보았는데, 결과가 다르게 나왔습니다.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Proc univariate 결과 : p-value 계산 안됨&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Hanwoo_0-1753943610783.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/108651iB5C111149E3D5821/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Hanwoo_0-1753943610783.png" alt="Hanwoo_0-1753943610783.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. Proc t-test 결과: p-value &amp;lt;.0001로 계산이 됨.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Hanwoo_1-1753943655035.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/108652iCAE01D520E57A71E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Hanwoo_1-1753943655035.png" alt="Hanwoo_1-1753943655035.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SD=0이면 수학적으로 one-sample t-test의 결과는 계산이 안 되는게 맞다고 생각되는데, 왜 Proc t-test를 했을 땐 &amp;lt;.0001로 결과가 나오는 건가요?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;어떤 Procedure를 쓰나에 따라 결과가 다르게 나오다니..&amp;nbsp; Proc t-test 문헌을 나름 꼼꼼히 살펴봤는데도, sd=0일 때 p-value가 계산이 된 이유가 이해가 안 가 질문 남겼습니다.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 06:37:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SD-0%EC%9D%B8-One-sample-t-test-%EA%B3%84%EC%82%B0-%EC%8B%9C-Proc-ttest-vs-Proc-univariate%EC%9D%98-%EA%B2%B0%EA%B3%BC/m-p/971746#M377384</guid>
      <dc:creator>Hanwoo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-31T06:37:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SD=0인 One sample t-test 계산 시 Proc ttest vs Proc univariate의 결과 차이 관련 문의</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SD-0%EC%9D%B8-One-sample-t-test-%EA%B3%84%EC%82%B0-%EC%8B%9C-Proc-ttest-vs-Proc-univariate%EC%9D%98-%EA%B2%B0%EA%B3%BC/m-p/971762#M377388</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Most likely this is an example of computers having limited numeric precision. See&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/comparing-two-values/m-p/761113#M240787" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Machine Precision&lt;/A&gt;. Or perhaps two different programmers chose to handle the extreme case of SD=0 slightly differently.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's nothing to worry about. I'm sure that in other cases, PROC UNIVARIATE and PROC TTEST will give matching results.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 11:03:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SD-0%EC%9D%B8-One-sample-t-test-%EA%B3%84%EC%82%B0-%EC%8B%9C-Proc-ttest-vs-Proc-univariate%EC%9D%98-%EA%B2%B0%EA%B3%BC/m-p/971762#M377388</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-31T11:03:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

