<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: About the review of CDISC data in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/About-the-review-of-CDISC-data/m-p/831650#M328668</link>
    <description>You could use this free software "SAS Clinical Standard Toolkit" to validate the SDTM or ADaM dataset is right or not .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/sassoftware/clinical-standards-toolkit" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/sassoftware/clinical-standards-toolkit&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or if you have money ,Buy JUMP software from SAS .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.jmp.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As fas as I know about half of FDA people to use JMP to check CDISC dataset .</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 10:17:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-09-03T10:17:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>About the review of CDISC data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/About-the-review-of-CDISC-data/m-p/831596#M328632</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a question for statistical analysts in clinical development.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there any way to efficiently review the CDISC data (SDTM, ADaM) delivered from the CRO at the time of dry run?&lt;BR /&gt;What we mean by review here is not to check if the CDISC rules are being followed using Pinnacle, but to check if the data is being converted as per the spec instructions, if any abnormal values are being generated, etc. (Are there any other points to be noted?&lt;BR /&gt;(Are there any other areas I should be aware of?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Currently, I am using&lt;BR /&gt;SAS: %data_specs&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Communities-Library/Library-Datasets-Summary-Macro-DATA-SPECS/ta-p/544757" target="_blank"&gt;https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Communities-Library/Library-Datasets-Summary-Macro-DATA-SPECS/ta-p/544757&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;R: library(dataexplorer)&lt;BR /&gt;but is there a better way?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I look forward to hearing from you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2022 17:00:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/About-the-review-of-CDISC-data/m-p/831596#M328632</guid>
      <dc:creator>sskt</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-02T17:00:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: About the review of CDISC data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/About-the-review-of-CDISC-data/m-p/831650#M328668</link>
      <description>You could use this free software "SAS Clinical Standard Toolkit" to validate the SDTM or ADaM dataset is right or not .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://github.com/sassoftware/clinical-standards-toolkit" target="_blank"&gt;https://github.com/sassoftware/clinical-standards-toolkit&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Or if you have money ,Buy JUMP software from SAS .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.jmp.com/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.jmp.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As fas as I know about half of FDA people to use JMP to check CDISC dataset .</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2022 10:17:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/About-the-review-of-CDISC-data/m-p/831650#M328668</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-09-03T10:17:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

