<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Does EXTENDOBSCOUNTER= Option Effect Performance (speed efficiency) of SAS in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129928#M260543</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the following question from all experts here and will be thankful for answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you get the following error in SAS Log,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"ERROR: File MYFILES.BIGFILE contains 2G -1 observations and cannot hold more because it contains an index or an Integrity Constraint that uses an index"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then you need to set EXTENDOBSCOUNTER=YES to get rid of above error. Such an error happens when you are working with very big data sets(&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/36/112.html" title="http://support.sas.com/kb/36/112.html"&gt;36112 - Managing large SAS® data sets that exceed the maximum number of observations&lt;/A&gt;). Actullay, sas documentation says, by specifying the EXTENDOBSCOUNTER= option when you create an output SAS data file, the resulting 32-bit file behaves like a 64-bit file regarding counters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have observed after setting the option "EXTENDOBSCOUNTER=YES" the performance of sas decreses i.e. SAS takes more time for the same task.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is:&amp;nbsp; does anybody know about this option and does it really effect the performance of SAS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ehsan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ehsanmath</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-10T07:03:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does EXTENDOBSCOUNTER= Option Effect Performance (speed efficiency) of SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129928#M260543</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the following question from all experts here and will be thankful for answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you get the following error in SAS Log,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"ERROR: File MYFILES.BIGFILE contains 2G -1 observations and cannot hold more because it contains an index or an Integrity Constraint that uses an index"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;then you need to set EXTENDOBSCOUNTER=YES to get rid of above error. Such an error happens when you are working with very big data sets(&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/36/112.html" title="http://support.sas.com/kb/36/112.html"&gt;36112 - Managing large SAS® data sets that exceed the maximum number of observations&lt;/A&gt;). Actullay, sas documentation says, by specifying the EXTENDOBSCOUNTER= option when you create an output SAS data file, the resulting 32-bit file behaves like a 64-bit file regarding counters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have observed after setting the option "EXTENDOBSCOUNTER=YES" the performance of sas decreses i.e. SAS takes more time for the same task.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is:&amp;nbsp; does anybody know about this option and does it really effect the performance of SAS?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ehsan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 07:03:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129928#M260543</guid>
      <dc:creator>ehsanmath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-10T07:03:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does EXTENDOBSCOUNTER= Option Effect Performance (speed efficiency) of SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129929#M260544</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why are you interested in using the option?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The option is really only useful in two situations:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. You are purposely creating a sas dataset that exceed's the observation count of you current system ( setting the eoc option to yes enables the file to be output/read )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. You are migrating a dataset that exceeds the observation limit of one of your systems that you are migrating between.&amp;nbsp; This process impacts performance itself, but not as a result of using the eoc option, but because of the CEDA processing to transcode between to two environments.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When you are using a 32 bit systems and exceeding a observation counter, it is better to switch the data engine you are using to SPDE.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have never seen a performance impact by setting this option.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:31:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129929#M260544</guid>
      <dc:creator>FriedEgg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-10T15:31:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does EXTENDOBSCOUNTER= Option Effect Performance (speed efficiency) of SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129930#M260545</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think I have situation 1. (explained in your earliear post)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am setting EXTENDOBSCOUNTER=YES in the LIBNAME statement option,&amp;nbsp; so newly created output files in the SAS library with an extended observation count. But it seems to me that this costs performance. Is it so? I am using 64-bit SAS 9.3 version on a 64-bit plateform.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 07:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129930#M260545</guid>
      <dc:creator>ehsanmath</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-11T07:58:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does EXTENDOBSCOUNTER= Option Effect Performance (speed efficiency) of SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129931#M260546</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think that the biggest concern about performance would be to question the need to create a single file containing more that 9.2 quadrillion records.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2013 12:02:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Does-EXTENDOBSCOUNTER-Option-Effect-Performance-speed-efficiency/m-p/129931#M260546</guid>
      <dc:creator>FriedEgg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-11T12:02:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

