<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Missing p-values in Proc GLM in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Missing-p-values-in-Proc-GLM/m-p/105073#M258438</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no room for error in your model, or in other words, you used up all your DFs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The terms are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Overall mean : 1 df&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;treatment means : 3 df&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;replicate means : 3 df&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interaction treatment x replicate means : 3x3 = 9 df&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total : 16 df = nb of observations&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your model has enough terms to fit each observation exactly. Without an estimate of error, you cannot derive p-values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-27T21:22:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Missing p-values in Proc GLM</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Missing-p-values-in-Proc-GLM/m-p/105072#M258437</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a research experiment to analyze where I would like to know if there is an interaction between two experimental factors. Let's say that the experiment has 4 replications (rep) and 4 treatments (trt) and I will call the measured variable xyz. I use the following language:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glm;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class rep trt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model xyz=rep|trt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The output will return dots in place of where p-values usually are. If I remove the interaction term from the model statement, I can get a p-value for rep and trt. Why does SAS not return p-values with more terms in the model? Is it a degrees of freedom issue?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 20:56:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Missing-p-values-in-Proc-GLM/m-p/105072#M258437</guid>
      <dc:creator>Wedgery325</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-27T20:56:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing p-values in Proc GLM</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Missing-p-values-in-Proc-GLM/m-p/105073#M258438</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no room for error in your model, or in other words, you used up all your DFs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The terms are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Overall mean : 1 df&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;treatment means : 3 df&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;replicate means : 3 df&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;interaction treatment x replicate means : 3x3 = 9 df&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Total : 16 df = nb of observations&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your model has enough terms to fit each observation exactly. Without an estimate of error, you cannot derive p-values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Missing-p-values-in-Proc-GLM/m-p/105073#M258438</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-27T21:22:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

