<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic low correlations between the dependent and independents in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99166#M257979</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #008000; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Courier New;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using a logistic regression and my biggest problem is the very low correlations between the dependent and independents. The highest correlation with the dependent variable is a spend variable with a boxcox transformation and yield only a correlation of 0.2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The results of my model are not very impressive and this, I beleive, it is related to the fact that all of the variables have a correlation lower or equal to 0.2 with the dependent, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the area under the curve is 0.684 and the classification table is below. on final note, I did try different transformations on all independents and interactions as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did someone had a similar experience?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:41:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sasuser1000</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-05T17:41:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>low correlations between the dependent and independents</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99166#M257979</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #008000; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Courier New;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using a logistic regression and my biggest problem is the very low correlations between the dependent and independents. The highest correlation with the dependent variable is a spend variable with a boxcox transformation and yield only a correlation of 0.2. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The results of my model are not very impressive and this, I beleive, it is related to the fact that all of the variables have a correlation lower or equal to 0.2 with the dependent, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the area under the curve is 0.684 and the classification table is below. on final note, I did try different transformations on all independents and interactions as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did someone had a similar experience?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 17:41:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99166#M257979</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasuser1000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-05T17:41:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: low correlations between the dependent and independents</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99167#M257980</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't recall if this ever happened to me, but low correlations usually mean poor model fit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:16:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99167#M257980</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-05T19:16:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: low correlations between the dependent and independents</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99168#M257981</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;After my posting, I have added a new variable from the database to my list of predictors and the distribution was bimodal which led me to think that my sample is including two different kind of population, i have corrected this and correlations are now fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 19:25:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99168#M257981</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasuser1000</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-05T19:25:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: low correlations between the dependent and independents</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99169#M257982</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a super good example of how important data visualization is to good analysis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/low-correlations-between-the-dependent-and-independents/m-p/99169#M257982</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-08T17:03:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

