<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: study design looking at efficacy of vaccine trial in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778152#M247689</link>
    <description>The basic method is Wiloncox test ,Check PROC NPAR1WAY .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or could check parameter method PROC LIFETEST .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or calling &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13633"&gt;@StatDave&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15363"&gt;@SteveDenham&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 11:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-11-03T11:58:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>study design looking at efficacy of vaccine trial</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/777378#M247306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Am new to this topic. Suppose I have a vaccine data and am asked to analyze the efficacy. The data was initially analyze for efficacy using&amp;nbsp;Kaplan–Meier estimator and I want to reanalyze the data using another method e.g. cox regression. Would cox regression be appropriate? what other methods can I attempt?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I aim to demonstrate that new treatment is better (superior) than control, my control is placebo. So i think this should be a superiority trial of vaccine vs placebo not active treatment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How can i get helpful sas code as resources? Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2021 18:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/777378#M247306</guid>
      <dc:creator>CathyVI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-29T18:06:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: study design looking at efficacy of vaccine trial</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/777492#M247365</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is your data censored ?&lt;BR /&gt;proc lifereg or proc phreg do survival analysis, that need your data is censored .&lt;BR /&gt;If not, you could try other normal model like : proc freq or proc logistic or proc ttest or proc npar1way or proc glm .....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2021 10:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/777492#M247365</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-30T10:45:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: study design looking at efficacy of vaccine trial</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778010#M247619</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, the data is censored. What other analytic method apart from cox regression can I attempt?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:44:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778010#M247619</guid>
      <dc:creator>CathyVI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-02T19:44:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: study design looking at efficacy of vaccine trial</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778152#M247689</link>
      <description>The basic method is Wiloncox test ,Check PROC NPAR1WAY .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or could check parameter method PROC LIFETEST .&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;or calling &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13633"&gt;@StatDave&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15363"&gt;@SteveDenham&lt;/a&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 11:58:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778152#M247689</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-03T11:58:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: study design looking at efficacy of vaccine trial</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778157#M247692</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have access to SAS/ETS, you might look at PROC QLIM for a variety of tobit analyses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, you may wish to look at this paper, as for a vaccine trial you will likely have competing events:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Global-Forum-Proceedings/A-SAS-Macro-to-Perform-Kaplan-Meier-Multiple-Imputation-for/ta-p/726336" target="_self"&gt;https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Global-Forum-Proceedings/A-SAS-Macro-to-Perform-Kaplan-Meier-Multiple-Imputation-for/ta-p/726336&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SteveDenham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2021 12:04:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778157#M247692</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-03T12:04:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: study design looking at efficacy of vaccine trial</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778932#M248019</link>
      <description>Thank you &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18408"&gt;@Ksharp&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/15363"&gt;@SteveDenham&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13633"&gt;@StatDave&lt;/a&gt;. Let me correct a mistake I said earlier. My data is not censored. I do not have any loss to follow up. No participants dropped out. I randomized 31 participants to the vaccine and 45 control, all participants completed the study except 1 control.&lt;BR /&gt;Can all the suggested analysis methods will still works in this case?</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Nov 2021 13:02:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/study-design-looking-at-efficacy-of-vaccine-trial/m-p/778932#M248019</guid>
      <dc:creator>CathyVI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-11-06T13:02:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

