<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pivot Data Proc Report vs Proc Transpose?? in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731587#M227895</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That's highly illogical; since the category is derived from BOTH dates, there cannot be a change from one date to the other, so the report as posted makes no sense and is factually wrong.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:25:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kurt_Bremser</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-04-06T13:25:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pivot Data Proc Report vs Proc Transpose??</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731493#M227851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;data have1;&lt;BR /&gt;format bi_date date9.;&lt;BR /&gt;infile datalines;&lt;BR /&gt;input ln_no $4. &lt;BR /&gt;days_past1 &lt;BR /&gt;bi_date date9. &lt;BR /&gt;tot_cnt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;;&lt;BR /&gt;return;&lt;BR /&gt;datalines;&lt;BR /&gt;1111 12 31Mar2020 1 &lt;BR /&gt;2122 12 31Mar2020 1&lt;BR /&gt;1244 12 31Mar2020 1&lt;BR /&gt;3333 44 31Mar2020 1&lt;BR /&gt;2222 30 31Mar2020 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;data have2;&lt;BR /&gt;format bi_date date9.;&lt;BR /&gt;infile datalines;&lt;BR /&gt;input ln_no $4. &lt;BR /&gt;days_past2 &lt;BR /&gt;bi_date date9. &lt;BR /&gt;tot_cnt&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;;&lt;BR /&gt;return;&lt;BR /&gt;datalines;&lt;BR /&gt;1111 22 30Apr2020 1 &lt;BR /&gt;2122 32 30Apr2020 1&lt;BR /&gt;1244 31 30Apr2020 1&lt;BR /&gt;3333 30 30Apr2020 1&lt;BR /&gt;2222 13 30Apr2020 1&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc sort data=have1;by ln_no;run;&lt;BR /&gt;proc sort data=have2;by ln_no;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;data merge_all;&lt;BR /&gt;merge have1 have2;&lt;BR /&gt;by ln_no;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;/***********************************/&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;produces the following&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="495"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD width="108"&gt;Category&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="73"&gt;bi_date1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="42"&gt;ln_no&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="75"&gt;days_past1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="51"&gt;tot_cnt&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="71"&gt;bi_date2&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="75"&gt;days_past2&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Current&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;31Mar2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1111&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;12&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;30Apr2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;22&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Curr_Past_Due&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;31Mar2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1244&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;12&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;30Apr2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;31&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Curr_Past_Due&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;31Mar2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;2122&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;12&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;30Apr2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;32&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Current&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;31Mar2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;2222&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;30&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;30Apr2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;13&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Past_to_Current&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;31Mar2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;3333&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;44&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;30Apr2020&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;30&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I attempting to do a pivot report however proc transpose only captures the first instance of date statistics.&amp;nbsp; I am thinking a proc report may do the trick but wanted input.&amp;nbsp; Here is the desired output&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="343"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD width="108"&gt;Category&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="77"&gt;31-Mar-20&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="67"&gt;30-Apr-20&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="91"&gt;Pct_Chg&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Current&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;0%&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Curr_Past_Due&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;0%&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;Past_to_Current&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;1&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;0&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD&gt;50%&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;
&lt;TABLE width="343"&gt;
&lt;TBODY&gt;
&lt;TR&gt;
&lt;TD width="108"&gt;Grand Total&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="77"&gt;3&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="67"&gt;2&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;TD width="91"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/TD&gt;
&lt;/TR&gt;
&lt;/TBODY&gt;
&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 01:00:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731493#M227851</guid>
      <dc:creator>Q1983</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-06T01:00:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pivot Data Proc Report vs Proc Transpose??</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731520#M227868</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is your formula for calculating the Category values?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 07:10:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731520#M227868</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kurt_Bremser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-06T07:10:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pivot Data Proc Report vs Proc Transpose??</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731570#M227889</link>
      <description>Here is the last part with the category formula&lt;BR /&gt;data merge_all;&lt;BR /&gt;length Category $25.;&lt;BR /&gt;merge have1 have2;&lt;BR /&gt;by ln_no;&lt;BR /&gt;if days_past1 &amp;lt;=30 and days_past2 &amp;lt;=30 then Category='Current';&lt;BR /&gt;if days_past1 &amp;lt;=30 and days_past2 &amp;gt; 30 then Category='Curr_Past_Due';&lt;BR /&gt;if days_past1 &amp;gt; 30 and days_past2 &amp;lt;=30 then Category='Past_to_Current';&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;run;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 11:48:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731570#M227889</guid>
      <dc:creator>Q1983</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-06T11:48:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pivot Data Proc Report vs Proc Transpose??</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731577#M227892</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please share the PROC REPORT code.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 12:25:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731577#M227892</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-06T12:25:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pivot Data Proc Report vs Proc Transpose??</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731587#M227895</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That's highly illogical; since the category is derived from BOTH dates, there cannot be a change from one date to the other, so the report as posted makes no sense and is factually wrong.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2021 13:25:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Pivot-Data-Proc-Report-vs-Proc-Transpose/m-p/731587#M227895</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kurt_Bremser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-04-06T13:25:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

