<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Surveylogistic: output issues in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Surveylogistic-output-issues/m-p/614320#M179545</link>
    <description>I’m using SAS to look at older ACEs data from the 2012 BRFSS dataset. Right now, I’m just trying to match the estimates I have from an official report done by the state health department I’m looking at. They have the ACEs divided into categories of: 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4+ (out of 8 total ACE types they look at).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’ve successfully gotten the prevalence estimates of each of the ACEs and the individual categories. What I’m having issues with is the surveylogistic procedure; they used the categories to look at outcomes of various things like employment, graduation rates, and smoking habits.&lt;BR /&gt;I can’t match the ORs. Sometimes I can get a relatively close pattern/trend, but never close to the ORs themselves.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’ve tried recoding the variables &amp;amp; categories various ways, but it doesn’t get me any closer to a more reasonable output. Any ideas of what might be going wrong and how to approach fixing it?</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SAS93</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-12-29T21:03:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Surveylogistic: output issues</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Surveylogistic-output-issues/m-p/614320#M179545</link>
      <description>I’m using SAS to look at older ACEs data from the 2012 BRFSS dataset. Right now, I’m just trying to match the estimates I have from an official report done by the state health department I’m looking at. They have the ACEs divided into categories of: 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4+ (out of 8 total ACE types they look at).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’ve successfully gotten the prevalence estimates of each of the ACEs and the individual categories. What I’m having issues with is the surveylogistic procedure; they used the categories to look at outcomes of various things like employment, graduation rates, and smoking habits.&lt;BR /&gt;I can’t match the ORs. Sometimes I can get a relatively close pattern/trend, but never close to the ORs themselves.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’ve tried recoding the variables &amp;amp; categories various ways, but it doesn’t get me any closer to a more reasonable output. Any ideas of what might be going wrong and how to approach fixing it?</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Dec 2019 21:03:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Surveylogistic-output-issues/m-p/614320#M179545</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS93</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-29T21:03:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Surveylogistic: output issues</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Surveylogistic-output-issues/m-p/614406#M179594</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/297876"&gt;@SAS93&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;I’m using SAS to look at older ACEs data from the 2012 BRFSS dataset. Right now, I’m just trying to match the estimates I have from an official report done by the state health department I’m looking at. They have the ACEs divided into categories of: 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4+ (out of 8 total ACE types they look at).&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’ve successfully gotten the prevalence estimates of each of the ACEs and the individual categories. What I’m having issues with is the surveylogistic procedure; they used the categories to look at outcomes of various things like employment, graduation rates, and smoking habits.&lt;BR /&gt;I can’t match the ORs. Sometimes I can get a relatively close pattern/trend, but never close to the ORs themselves.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I’ve tried recoding the variables &amp;amp; categories various ways, but it doesn’t get me any closer to a more reasonable output. Any ideas of what might be going wrong and how to approach fixing it?&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did "they" share the code used?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you sure that you are using the same data set as "they"?&amp;nbsp; If you use the National available data set it is not the same as available to state BRFSS coordinators&amp;nbsp;and you can get different results. Plus the state health department may have had other considerations for inclusion/exclusion of data for a specific analysis.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And as a minimum you might want to share the code you used as there are options that are typically used for BRFSS that you may not have used such as NOMCAR.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 15:33:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Surveylogistic-output-issues/m-p/614406#M179594</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-12-30T15:33:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

