<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Benchmarking two CPUs in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569448#M160475</link>
    <description>I'd say if you have access to a server you should have no problem with speed. Why are you working locally?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:33:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-27T14:33:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Benchmarking two CPUs</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569313#M160418</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to convince management that getting a better CPU will increase the performance of SAS but they need concrete numbers before I can push things farther.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Luckily my coworker has an I7 16gb ram and I have I5 8gb ram. My plan was to run two identical programs overnight and see which computer finishes first.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have an idea of some good code that could test CPU performance? What SAS operations stress the CPU the most?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:50:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569313#M160418</guid>
      <dc:creator>michelconn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T00:50:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmarking two CPUs</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569316#M160420</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Will this link be of use to you (&lt;A href="https://www.lexjansen.com/nesug/nesug10/ma/ma09.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.lexjansen.com/nesug/nesug10/ma/ma09.pdf&lt;/A&gt;)?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 01:23:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569316#M160420</guid>
      <dc:creator>koyelghosh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T01:23:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmarking two CPUs</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569320#M160423</link>
      <description>RAM isn't a huge deal usually with SAS, but disk types can be - my SSD is about 10x as fast as my non-ssd drives.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 03:07:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569320#M160423</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T03:07:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmarking two CPUs</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569325#M160426</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/13879"&gt;@Reeza&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;You are right. Nice point about SSD and non-SSD drives. However in some cases you can choose to do in memory computation (also called in-memory analytics) as advertised here (&lt;A href="https://www.sas.com/en_in/solutions/in-memory-analytics.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.sas.com/en_in/solutions/in-memory-analytics.html&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In such a case having more memory might be better.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 04:06:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569325#M160426</guid>
      <dc:creator>koyelghosh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T04:06:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmarking two CPUs</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569339#M160436</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you want to pinpoint CPU types as the performance driver, you need to isolate that fact. Meaning that everything else (main bus/bridge, I/O and network controllers, storage) must be identical.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But from my SAS experience, it's not the processors, but mainly your storage where most performance can be gained. Switching from, say, a single spinning metal drive to multiple SSDs will feel like being on a different planet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What is your current SAS setup? Client/server, or desktops only? If the second, how many desktops? If the first, what kind of hardware and which operating system on the server?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 06:46:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569339#M160436</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kurt_Bremser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T06:46:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmarking two CPUs</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569393#M160459</link>
      <description>I am desktop only but most of the data I pull from is stored on a server. I would say a majority of my work is done on my local machine.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 12:17:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569393#M160459</guid>
      <dc:creator>michelconn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T12:17:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmarking two CPUs</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569426#M160464</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Then you might want to concentrate your SAS computing power on the server. Add cores there, and set up a BI server (if not yet present), and drop the desktop installations. A centralized setup will need more attention one time while setting up, but be much easier to maintain later on.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Servers are usually better equipped with regards to storage.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 13:42:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569426#M160464</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kurt_Bremser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T13:42:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Benchmarking two CPUs</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569448#M160475</link>
      <description>I'd say if you have access to a server you should have no problem with speed. Why are you working locally?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 14:33:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Benchmarking-two-CPUs/m-p/569448#M160475</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T14:33:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

