<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Kepp dataset option. Reading large tables. in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Keep-dataset-option-Reading-large-tables/m-p/73204#M15750</link>
    <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You might want to test it yourself by adding the fullstimer option. Then try to compare the results.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Milton</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>milts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-25T09:07:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Keep dataset option. Reading large tables.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Keep-dataset-option-Reading-large-tables/m-p/73203#M15749</link>
      <description>Hi. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Will be there or not any difference in perfomance in following situation.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have two tables.&lt;BR /&gt;
Table A has three columns and 10G in size. I need data from two columns 'a' and 'b'.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Table B has 50 columns and 100G(or more) in size. It has the same 'a' and 'b' columns and same data in them.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
If i'll use code like this&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
data SOMETHING;&lt;BR /&gt;
  set A(keep=a b);&lt;BR /&gt;
  something;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
data SOMETHING;&lt;BR /&gt;
  set B(keep=a b);&lt;BR /&gt;
  something;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Would it be any difference in performance?&lt;BR /&gt;
Or it doesn't matter which table I'll read - Big or Small.

Message was edited by: Opa4ki</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:19:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Keep-dataset-option-Reading-large-tables/m-p/73203#M15749</guid>
      <dc:creator>Opa4ki</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-25T08:19:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kepp dataset option. Reading large tables.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Keep-dataset-option-Reading-large-tables/m-p/73204#M15750</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You might want to test it yourself by adding the fullstimer option. Then try to compare the results.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Milton</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Keep-dataset-option-Reading-large-tables/m-p/73204#M15750</guid>
      <dc:creator>milts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-25T09:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kepp dataset option. Reading large tables.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Keep-dataset-option-Reading-large-tables/m-p/73205#M15751</link>
      <description>I would expect that reading table A performes better as there should be less i/o.&lt;BR /&gt;
As mentioned already fullstimer would give you some real values.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
There was lately a interesting discussion in the SAS newsgroup which also might give you some insight:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.soft-sys.sas/browse_thread/thread/7cc579c99df3badc?hl=en" target="_blank"&gt;http://groups.google.com.au/group/comp.soft-sys.sas/browse_thread/thread/7cc579c99df3badc?hl=en&lt;/A&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Keep-dataset-option-Reading-large-tables/m-p/73205#M15751</guid>
      <dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-25T10:15:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

