<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SAS in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS/m-p/480808#M124283</link>
    <description>&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc sql ;
	create table _01_iv_of_i as
	select distinct a.*, b.code as b_code, b.index_of, c.code as c_code, index_proc
	from derived._01_ser_inf as a 
	inner join derived._01_of as b
	on a.enrolid = b.enrolid 
	inner join derived._01_iv as c
	on a.enrolid = c.enrolid ;
quit ;/*15257338*/

%count_pt ;
%print ;
/*UNION TO GET ALL CODES IN ONE ROW */
proc sql ;	
	create table derived._01_ic_of_i2 as
	select distinct enrolid, index_i as svcdate format mmddyy10., code 
	from _01_iv_of_i 
	union 
	select distinct enrolid , index_of as svcdate format mmddyy10. , b_code as code
	from _01_iv_of_i
	union 
	select distinct enrolid, index_proc as svcdate format mmddyy10., c_code as code
	from _01_iv_of_i;
quit;/*184553*/&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;why do i have less observations in the second step. Should i not be having double&amp;nbsp; or more ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:36:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>manya92</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-24T14:36:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS/m-p/480808#M124283</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc sql ;
	create table _01_iv_of_i as
	select distinct a.*, b.code as b_code, b.index_of, c.code as c_code, index_proc
	from derived._01_ser_inf as a 
	inner join derived._01_of as b
	on a.enrolid = b.enrolid 
	inner join derived._01_iv as c
	on a.enrolid = c.enrolid ;
quit ;/*15257338*/

%count_pt ;
%print ;
/*UNION TO GET ALL CODES IN ONE ROW */
proc sql ;	
	create table derived._01_ic_of_i2 as
	select distinct enrolid, index_i as svcdate format mmddyy10., code 
	from _01_iv_of_i 
	union 
	select distinct enrolid , index_of as svcdate format mmddyy10. , b_code as code
	from _01_iv_of_i
	union 
	select distinct enrolid, index_proc as svcdate format mmddyy10., c_code as code
	from _01_iv_of_i;
quit;/*184553*/&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;why do i have less observations in the second step. Should i not be having double&amp;nbsp; or more ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:36:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS/m-p/480808#M124283</guid>
      <dc:creator>manya92</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-24T14:36:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS/m-p/480811#M124285</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Union Vs UNION ALL.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Union does not inlcude duplicates, union all includes duplicates.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;However, since in this case it's not true duplicates you definitely want UNION ALL.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/208127"&gt;@manya92&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc sql ;
	create table _01_iv_of_i as
	select distinct a.*, b.code as b_code, b.index_of, c.code as c_code, index_proc
	from derived._01_ser_inf as a 
	inner join derived._01_of as b
	on a.enrolid = b.enrolid 
	inner join derived._01_iv as c
	on a.enrolid = c.enrolid ;
quit ;/*15257338*/

%count_pt ;
%print ;
/*UNION TO GET ALL CODES IN ONE ROW */
proc sql ;	
	create table derived._01_ic_of_i2 as
	select distinct enrolid, index_i as svcdate format mmddyy10., code 
	from _01_iv_of_i 
	union 
	select distinct enrolid , index_of as svcdate format mmddyy10. , b_code as code
	from _01_iv_of_i
	union 
	select distinct enrolid, index_proc as svcdate format mmddyy10., c_code as code
	from _01_iv_of_i;
quit;/*184553*/&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;why do i have less observations in the second step. Should i not be having double&amp;nbsp; or more ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:47:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS/m-p/480811#M124285</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-24T14:47:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS/m-p/480819#M124288</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/208127"&gt;@manya92&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;could you provide meaningful titles on your posts from now on? SOmething like "Two PROC SQLs not producing same results". Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:54:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/SAS/m-p/480819#M124288</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-24T14:54:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

