<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic in SAS Programming</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454649#M114905</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;what does your code look like?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:00:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PeterClemmensen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-17T08:00:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454618#M114900</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I actually wanted testing the goodness of fit of my model developed from PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC but since it doesn't give such options, I opted for PROC LOGISTIC just to test the goodness of fit of my model it gave me the output below. can I say my model is adequate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SAS Output&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="branch"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV align="center"&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Capture.PNG" style="width: 351px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/19850iE668547B22DEAFE6/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Capture.PNG" alt="Capture.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 03:01:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454618#M114900</guid>
      <dc:creator>sammmy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T03:01:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454631#M114902</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have 57.000 degrees of freedom in your model?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 06:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454631#M114902</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterClemmensen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T06:22:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454645#M114903</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not sure where the 57000 is coming from but my observations are 66000&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 07:45:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454645#M114903</guid>
      <dc:creator>sammmy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T07:45:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454649#M114905</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what does your code look like?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 08:00:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454649#M114905</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterClemmensen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T08:00:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454708#M114926</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;PROC LOGISTIC DATA= risk ;
CLASS X1 X2 X3 X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17/param=glm;
 MODEL Y (Event = '1')=X1 X2 X3 X4  X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17/ 
    LINK=LOGIT expb LACKFIT scale=none 
	aggregate=(X1 X2 X3 X4  X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 X11 X12 X13 X14 X15 X16 X17) ;
RUN;QUIT;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454708#M114926</guid>
      <dc:creator>sammmy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T12:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454714#M114927</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE class=" language-sas"&gt;&lt;CODE class="  language-sas"&gt;aggregate&lt;SPAN class="token operator"&gt;=&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="token punctuation"&gt;(&lt;/SPAN&gt;X1 X2 X3 X4  X5 X6 X7 X8 X9 X10 &lt;SPAN class="token procnames"&gt;X11&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="token procnames"&gt;X12&lt;/SPAN&gt; X13 X14 X15 X16 X17&lt;SPAN class="token punctuation"&gt;)&lt;/SPAN&gt; &lt;SPAN class="token punctuation"&gt;;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;====&amp;gt;&lt;BR /&gt;aggregate ;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:31:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454714#M114927</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T12:31:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454715#M114928</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If your model looks good, Value/DF should be near 1 .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:35:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454715#M114928</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T12:35:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454720#M114930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Okay, for both statistic or for any of them?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 12:49:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454720#M114930</guid>
      <dc:creator>sammmy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T12:49:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Goodness of fit for surveylogistic</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454729#M114934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good question. Should be both, but I would accept any of it .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 13:26:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Programming/Goodness-of-fit-for-surveylogistic/m-p/454729#M114934</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T13:26:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

