<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: AMO Filter vs Enterprise Guide Filter in Microsoft Integration with SAS</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/299#M39</link>
    <description>That's a pity - it is a very real problem.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:10:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2006-04-05T20:10:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>AMO Filter vs Enterprise Guide Filter</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/297#M37</link>
      <description>Hi,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I believe that the filter option on the Enterprise Guide query builder is much better and safer than the one in AMO. The reason is that I have seen users often create AMO filters with multiple lines and when they string, say, 2 ANDs and an OR together, they don't realise that what they are getting back is not what they wanted.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The graphical nature of the filter in EG makes this much more obvious.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Are there any plans to update this in AMO?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 21:34:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/297#M37</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-03-27T21:34:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMO Filter vs Enterprise Guide Filter</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/298#M38</link>
      <description>I understand your concern.  We've had some confusion surrounding the AND and OR operator precedence here as well.  There are currently no plans to address this issue.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 13:28:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/298#M38</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bill_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-03T13:28:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMO Filter vs Enterprise Guide Filter</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/299#M39</link>
      <description>That's a pity - it is a very real problem.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 20:10:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/299#M39</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-04-05T20:10:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMO Filter vs Enterprise Guide Filter</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/300#M40</link>
      <description>You could generate your filtering in EG with the graphic option.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Further on work on the generated code and adapt it to your needs (and / or's. That is what is so fantastic in EG. You mainly have a solution for any need.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Pablo</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:00:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/300#M40</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-11T12:00:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: AMO Filter vs Enterprise Guide Filter</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/301#M41</link>
      <description>Yes, but users who use AMO in my experience do so because they are not users of EG. The AMO filter needs to be foolproof for these typically lesz expert users.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The EG3 graphical query builder (ie the 'Filter' tab) is excellent and is exactly what is needed in AMO.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have seen major problems when people create a complicated filter (ie ANDs plus ORs) in AMO - the data they get is not what they think they are getting. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
The EG4 query builder has some disadvantages compared to the EG3 query builder, and one is the loss of this graphical filter.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In fact, I was disappointed to see so much work put into the query builder in EG4. It is by far the best part of EG3 and should have been left alone IMO - there are plenty of other areas in more need of enhancement.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:05:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Microsoft-Integration-with-SAS/AMO-Filter-vs-Enterprise-Guide-Filter/m-p/301#M41</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2006-08-18T17:05:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

