<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc Logistic Error: All observations have same response in New SAS User</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Proc-Logistic-Error-All-observations-have-same-response/m-p/555110#M9600</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The log didn't mention any excluded observations, but I went back in and filled in the missing values, and everything is working now.&amp;nbsp; Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>danteploy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-30T16:13:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc Logistic Error: All observations have same response</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Proc-Logistic-Error-All-observations-have-same-response/m-p/555091#M9598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm attempting to run the following piece of code, but getting the error that all observations have the same response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;proc&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;logistic&lt;/STRONG&gt; data=reg_sample descending&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; plots(only)=roc(id=obs)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; outmodel=logit_model&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; outest=logit_coeffs;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class tran_type occupation_desc SAR NRA SUB PCG;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model ESC_R = tran_type&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PCG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cash_cr&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cash_cr_count&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cash_db&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; cash_db_count&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; risk_score&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; days_first_to_last&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; account_count&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; trigger_count&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; avg_tran_amount&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; branch_count&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; whole_dollar_trans&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; round_10_trans&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; round_100_trans&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; round_1000_trans&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; tenure&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; OCCUPATION_DESC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; prior_fps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; prior_escs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; prior_crips&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CTRs_filed&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; international_db&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; InCaT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; OutCaT&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SAR&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; NRA&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; SUB/ selection=stepwise link=logit rsquare EXPB;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;run&lt;/STRONG&gt;;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can see, from running Proc Freq, that the observations definitely have different responses.&amp;nbsp; Is there something else I need to change about my code?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ESC_R&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Frequency&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Percent&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Cumulative&lt;BR /&gt;Frequency&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Cumulative&lt;BR /&gt;Percent&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;9235&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;84.45&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;9235&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;84.45&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;1700&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;15.55&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;10935&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD&gt;&lt;P&gt;100.00&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:40:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Proc-Logistic-Error-All-observations-have-same-response/m-p/555091#M9598</guid>
      <dc:creator>danteploy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-30T15:40:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Logistic Error: All observations have same response</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Proc-Logistic-Error-All-observations-have-same-response/m-p/555106#M9599</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did the log mention anything about how many observations may have been excluded?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any record with any of the model variables missing is going to be excluded by default. So if all of the records that have all of those variables present only have the same value of the ESC_R variable that could happen.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As an almost complete guess I would be tempted to run proc freq on Incat*outcat.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The names of those variables make me suspect than a record may be unlikely to have an incat and outcat at the same time.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Proc-Logistic-Error-All-observations-have-same-response/m-p/555106#M9599</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-30T15:57:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Logistic Error: All observations have same response</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Proc-Logistic-Error-All-observations-have-same-response/m-p/555110#M9600</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The log didn't mention any excluded observations, but I went back in and filled in the missing values, and everything is working now.&amp;nbsp; Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Proc-Logistic-Error-All-observations-have-same-response/m-p/555110#M9600</guid>
      <dc:creator>danteploy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-30T16:13:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

