<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Missing Entries in New SAS User</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541520#M7383</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Examine code used for the extract.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Look for any filters such as WHERE clause may reduce the expected results because of values of variables,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or GROUP BY creating summaries, joins or similar things that could reduce the data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also ensure that the source actually has 100 or more records to pull from.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Personally I would suggest (politely in&amp;nbsp;an interview)&amp;nbsp;that the question needs to be rephrased.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SAS &lt;STRONG&gt;has pulled&lt;/STRONG&gt; out first 100 observations from Database using pass through&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That phrasing implies that the 100 were actually pulled. If the question was more like:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SAS &lt;STRONG&gt;requested&lt;/STRONG&gt; the&amp;nbsp;first 100 observations from Database using pass through&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then the question makes more sense to me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 18:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-08T18:23:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Missing Entries</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541504#M7380</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In one of the interview, I've been asked below question, I would appreciate if someone would dignify with Answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"SAS has requested first 100 observations from Database using pass through , However only 90 has come out , Now from where we can begin the investigation" ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think we can run the trace ? if yes what is the process for it&amp;nbsp; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jai&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 18:57:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541504#M7380</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaiganesh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-08T18:57:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing Entries</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541520#M7383</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Examine code used for the extract.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Look for any filters such as WHERE clause may reduce the expected results because of values of variables,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;or GROUP BY creating summaries, joins or similar things that could reduce the data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also ensure that the source actually has 100 or more records to pull from.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Personally I would suggest (politely in&amp;nbsp;an interview)&amp;nbsp;that the question needs to be rephrased.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SAS &lt;STRONG&gt;has pulled&lt;/STRONG&gt; out first 100 observations from Database using pass through&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That phrasing implies that the 100 were actually pulled. If the question was more like:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SAS &lt;STRONG&gt;requested&lt;/STRONG&gt; the&amp;nbsp;first 100 observations from Database using pass through&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then the question makes more sense to me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 18:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541520#M7383</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-08T18:23:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing Entries</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541533#M7385</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your right, I've changed the Word from Pulled to Requested, So other people would not get confuse.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jai&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 18:59:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541533#M7385</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaiganesh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-08T18:59:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing Entries</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541536#M7386</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Actually interviewer was more keen to know , from where the investigation can be start, Rather than the way we would fix them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;He was more emphasizing on Running the Trace, Please suggest with the process / options of running Trace.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jai&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2019 19:01:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541536#M7386</guid>
      <dc:creator>jaiganesh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-08T19:01:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing Entries</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541676#M7405</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;options sastrace=',,,d' sastraceloc=saslog;

proc sql;
.........
SQL code
............
quit;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 11:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541676#M7405</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-09T11:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Missing Entries</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541702#M7409</link>
      <description>Ksharp&lt;BR /&gt;I would say your are brilliant&lt;BR /&gt;Way of coding &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":thumbs_up:"&gt;👍&lt;/span&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2019 15:44:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Missing-Entries/m-p/541702#M7409</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrahmanandaRao</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-09T15:44:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

