<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 3-Way Tables - PROC TABULATE v. PROC FREQ in New SAS User</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/3-Way-Tables-PROC-TABULATE-v-PROC-FREQ/m-p/859021#M37946</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you may want to the TABLE statement options LIST or CROSSLIST&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:27:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>data_null__</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-02-15T18:27:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>3-Way Tables - PROC TABULATE v. PROC FREQ</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/3-Way-Tables-PROC-TABULATE-v-PROC-FREQ/m-p/859018#M37945</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to create a 3-way table in PROC FREQ where the 3 variables &lt;STRONG&gt;are all in one table&lt;/STRONG&gt;?&amp;nbsp;I know this can be done in PROC TABULATE.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In PROC FREQ, when I cross the 3 variables&amp;nbsp;(e.g., tables var1*var2*var3), I get bivariate analyses for var2 and var3 for each level of var1 &lt;STRONG&gt;in a separate table&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:13:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/3-Way-Tables-PROC-TABULATE-v-PROC-FREQ/m-p/859018#M37945</guid>
      <dc:creator>_maldini_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-15T18:13:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3-Way Tables - PROC TABULATE v. PROC FREQ</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/3-Way-Tables-PROC-TABULATE-v-PROC-FREQ/m-p/859021#M37946</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think you may want to the TABLE statement options LIST or CROSSLIST&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:27:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/3-Way-Tables-PROC-TABULATE-v-PROC-FREQ/m-p/859021#M37946</guid>
      <dc:creator>data_null__</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-15T18:27:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 3-Way Tables - PROC TABULATE v. PROC FREQ</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/3-Way-Tables-PROC-TABULATE-v-PROC-FREQ/m-p/859023#M37947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In proc freq the option LIST will place all of the variable on one row with the count and percent similar to a one-way table:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tables var1*var2*var3*var4 / list ;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;IF you might have missing values for &lt;STRONG&gt;any&lt;/STRONG&gt; of the variables you likely will want to add the MISSING option as well, otherwise combinations of variables that include missing values will not be shown.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:34:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/3-Way-Tables-PROC-TABULATE-v-PROC-FREQ/m-p/859023#M37947</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-02-15T18:34:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

