<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Question about JMP Theory (Formulation Example) in New SAS User</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Question-about-JMP-Theory-Formulation-Example/m-p/829348#M35524</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear SAS Community,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question that may require a bit of DOE theoretical background. I am trying to optimize a formulation. Because of the industry that I am in, it is typical to express the entire formulation as a percentage of some base ingredient. For example, if the base ingredient is always 100 and other components are expressed as proportions of the the base ingredient, the formulation {x = 0.1, y = 0.2, z = 0.3} means 100 parts base ingredient, 10 parts x, 20 parts y, and 30 parts z. Inside JMP, I am only setting x, y, and z as factors (and not the base ingredient) to lower the number of experiments I need to run, and the base ingredient is always 100 in my experiments. In addition, for cost considerations, I am setting the linear constraint Ax + By + Cz &amp;lt;= L, where A, B, C, and L are the costs and limits. My question is, if I ideally want to fix x+y+z to be a particular fraction (and hence x+y+z divided by the total formulation mass would always be fixed in all my experiments), would I still need to set this x+y+z linear constraint, or would the&amp;nbsp;Ax + By + Cz &amp;lt;= L constraint suffice, because after doing the experiments, obtaining the results, and inputting them inside JMP would lead me to the optimal formulation anyway?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alessandro21</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-08-19T12:47:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question about JMP Theory (Formulation Example)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Question-about-JMP-Theory-Formulation-Example/m-p/829348#M35524</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear SAS Community,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question that may require a bit of DOE theoretical background. I am trying to optimize a formulation. Because of the industry that I am in, it is typical to express the entire formulation as a percentage of some base ingredient. For example, if the base ingredient is always 100 and other components are expressed as proportions of the the base ingredient, the formulation {x = 0.1, y = 0.2, z = 0.3} means 100 parts base ingredient, 10 parts x, 20 parts y, and 30 parts z. Inside JMP, I am only setting x, y, and z as factors (and not the base ingredient) to lower the number of experiments I need to run, and the base ingredient is always 100 in my experiments. In addition, for cost considerations, I am setting the linear constraint Ax + By + Cz &amp;lt;= L, where A, B, C, and L are the costs and limits. My question is, if I ideally want to fix x+y+z to be a particular fraction (and hence x+y+z divided by the total formulation mass would always be fixed in all my experiments), would I still need to set this x+y+z linear constraint, or would the&amp;nbsp;Ax + By + Cz &amp;lt;= L constraint suffice, because after doing the experiments, obtaining the results, and inputting them inside JMP would lead me to the optimal formulation anyway?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2022 12:47:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Question-about-JMP-Theory-Formulation-Example/m-p/829348#M35524</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alessandro21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-19T12:47:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question about JMP Theory (Formulation Example)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Question-about-JMP-Theory-Formulation-Example/m-p/829352#M35526</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Probably best to ask in the JMP Communities&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.jmp.com/" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.jmp.com/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2022 13:23:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Question-about-JMP-Theory-Formulation-Example/m-p/829352#M35526</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-08-19T13:23:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

