<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Replicating the function of Optimal Binning Function (SAS EM) in New SAS User</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Replicating-the-function-of-Optimal-Binning-Function-SAS-EM/m-p/573652#M12549</link>
    <description>Getting the scoring code is usually an easier way, but it's also just;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;outcome = intercept + 0.2 * VAR1 + 0.111*opt_var01 + 022*opt_var02 + 0.32*opt_varo03; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your 04 is included as the reference level and in the intercept.  (not included in the select model because you need n-1 dummy variables for 4 levels). So you'll need to bin the data to how you did before, but again, the scoring code does that for you.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-07-15T18:57:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Replicating the function of Optimal Binning Function (SAS EM)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Replicating-the-function-of-Optimal-Binning-Function-SAS-EM/m-p/573642#M12548</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a question about how to interpret the SAS EM output on Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates from linear regression model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our model has 2 predictors (i.e., var1 and var2). We used the opt binning transformation on var2. We used 4 bins for VAR2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;The coefficients from my selected regression model for variables are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;INTERCEPT = 1.234&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VAR1 = 0.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OPT_VAR2 01 =&amp;nbsp; 0.111&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OPT _VAR2 02 = 0.22&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OPT _VAR2 03 = 0.32&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OPT_VAR2 04 BIN was not included in the selected model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are hoping for help to determine the missing piece of the following equation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Outcome = intercept + 0.2VAR1 + ???&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:19:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Replicating-the-function-of-Optimal-Binning-Function-SAS-EM/m-p/573642#M12548</guid>
      <dc:creator>willfagerland</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-15T18:19:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Replicating the function of Optimal Binning Function (SAS EM)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Replicating-the-function-of-Optimal-Binning-Function-SAS-EM/m-p/573652#M12549</link>
      <description>Getting the scoring code is usually an easier way, but it's also just;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;outcome = intercept + 0.2 * VAR1 + 0.111*opt_var01 + 022*opt_var02 + 0.32*opt_varo03; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Your 04 is included as the reference level and in the intercept.  (not included in the select model because you need n-1 dummy variables for 4 levels). So you'll need to bin the data to how you did before, but again, the scoring code does that for you.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2019 18:57:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/New-SAS-User/Replicating-the-function-of-Optimal-Binning-Function-SAS-EM/m-p/573652#M12549</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-07-15T18:57:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

