<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Alert Assignment on Queu : Routing Rules in Fraud, AML and Security Intelligence</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Fraud-AML-and-Security/Alert-Assignment-on-Queu-Routing-Rules/m-p/985812#M1158</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an implemention for AML on Viya 4 where customer having a requirement they have two level of investigations Level 1&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp; level 2 and there are users who are in both groups and they wanted to make sure if the customer took disposition action on the alert from level 1 he should not be able to take an action on the same alert as level 2 ( to work as maker / checker)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any idea how this feature can be controlled using routing rules in queue definition or is there could be altenative approach to prevent such situation?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 09:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>smehae</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2026-04-02T09:20:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Alert Assignment on Queu : Routing Rules</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Fraud-AML-and-Security/Alert-Assignment-on-Queu-Routing-Rules/m-p/985812#M1158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have an implemention for AML on Viya 4 where customer having a requirement they have two level of investigations Level 1&amp;nbsp; &amp;amp; level 2 and there are users who are in both groups and they wanted to make sure if the customer took disposition action on the alert from level 1 he should not be able to take an action on the same alert as level 2 ( to work as maker / checker)&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Any idea how this feature can be controlled using routing rules in queue definition or is there could be altenative approach to prevent such situation?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 09:20:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Fraud-AML-and-Security/Alert-Assignment-on-Queu-Routing-Rules/m-p/985812#M1158</guid>
      <dc:creator>smehae</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-04-02T09:20:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

