<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SAS Forecast Studio - Scoring Existing ARIMAX Models on New Data (Independent Variables) in SAS Forecasting and Econometrics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136403#M815</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please excuse for asking the obvious, but were the x variables included to your winning models?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, when you say validation data points, are you talking about hold-out samples or out-of-sample data?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How different are your next x values from the previous values and what do the parameter estimates for the x values look like?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe your expectation about the impact of the x variables does not hold true?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Udo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:41:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>udo_sas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-07T22:41:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SAS Forecast Studio - Scoring Existing ARIMAX Models on New Data (Independent Variables)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136399#M811</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have built some ARIMA models based on the true drivers of the response variable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to generate forecasts of the response based on new values of the predictors with same set of parameter estimates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help me understand how to achieve this and how prepare the new dataset required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks very much in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:19:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136399#M811</guid>
      <dc:creator>DrSharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-07T12:19:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Forecast Studio - Scoring Existing ARIMAX Models on New Data (Independent Variables)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136400#M812</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If using Forecast Studio all you have to do is to append the new history to the data set which you used to build the models.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, when you open your project you will be prompted what you would like to do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the options if to reuse existing models and existing parameter:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Forecast: refresh the current forecast model, using the same parameter values"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That should do the trick.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can accomplish the same by using HPFENGINE of course.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Udo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:44:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136400#M812</guid>
      <dc:creator>udo_sas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-07T12:44:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Forecast Studio - Scoring Existing ARIMAX Models on New Data (Independent Variables)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136401#M813</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS: by the way - using the scenario analysis feature of SAS Forecast Studio you will be able to change future values of your predictor variables interactively.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 15:56:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136401#M813</guid>
      <dc:creator>udo_sas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-07T15:56:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Forecast Studio - Scoring Existing ARIMAX Models on New Data (Independent Variables)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136402#M814</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Udo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually, I had some 20 time series to model and project for next 6 months.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Initially I had kept 50 data points (Apr'08 till May'12) to train the model and next 12 data points (Jun'12 to May'13) for validation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So, I had 62 data points in the dataset for each of the 20 series being analyzed. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After building the models I replaced the dataset with new updated one having the next 6 future values of the x variables with response&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;variable values as missing. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I chose the same option as you've mentioned "Forecast: refresh the current forecast model, using the same parameter values".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I still obtained the same future forecast values as I saw before updating the dataset with new values of x variables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought I was making some mistake. Could you please shed some light?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks once again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 17:50:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136402#M814</guid>
      <dc:creator>DrSharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-07T17:50:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Forecast Studio - Scoring Existing ARIMAX Models on New Data (Independent Variables)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136403#M815</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please excuse for asking the obvious, but were the x variables included to your winning models?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, when you say validation data points, are you talking about hold-out samples or out-of-sample data?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How different are your next x values from the previous values and what do the parameter estimates for the x values look like?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maybe your expectation about the impact of the x variables does not hold true?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Udo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:41:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136403#M815</guid>
      <dc:creator>udo_sas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-07T22:41:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Forecast Studio - Scoring Existing ARIMAX Models on New Data (Independent Variables)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136404#M816</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Udo,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, the winning models were having the the x variables included.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By validation data I meant the holdout sample. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The new x values are significantly different but within the expected range, look normal as the rest of the values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The parameter estimates of the transfer model components take different combinations, sometimes with very small p-values, and sometime with very high values. But the p-values do matter here?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your time &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2014 11:42:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136404#M816</guid>
      <dc:creator>DrSharma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-08T11:42:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SAS Forecast Studio - Scoring Existing ARIMAX Models on New Data (Independent Variables)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136405#M817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello -&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for clarification - the p-values should not matter, indeed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At this point in time it is probably better to open a ticket with Technical Support, who can assist with tracking down this problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Udo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:53:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Forecasting-and-Econometrics/SAS-Forecast-Studio-Scoring-Existing-ARIMAX-Models-on-New-Data/m-p/136405#M817</guid>
      <dc:creator>udo_sas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-10T17:53:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

